They're Called Users

The eternal tragedy of our existence captured in two panels! 😭 Top: Code doesn't work and you're absolutely DYING to know why. Bottom: Code suddenly works and you're like "DON'T TOUCH ANYTHING, DON'T BREATHE, DON'T EVEN LOOK AT IT!" The cosmic horror of programming is not when things break, but when they mysteriously start working without you understanding why. The universe is cruel and chaotic, and we're just frantically typing monkeys pretending we have control!

Content Almost done with a project during testing: there is one more thing i want you to add "These few thing would be nice too" "Lets schedule another meeting about this project made with mematic ProdrammerHumor.io

Content Obelion 895 .. 1h If there's nothing about your problem on the internet, there's a high chance you are just stupid PROGRAMMERS

Content 8 Program not responding CLICK CLICK CLICK, ICK CLICK CLICK K CLICK ICKI CLI CK 1 C dick dick "dick dick -Bx Issue Resolved 317 clicks has corrected the error

Content Instructions Sections 01. Technical 00. 30 utteristed Submit Candidate the casan 0. Stacks 19. What is the output of the following code? for I in range(10); for J in range(2, 10, 1): continue variet1 else: vartE1 print(var) Ops: A D(5. 10) B. G15 C. Odo' si D. O Syntax Error Q 20. If we use the mean as a model, what does the variance represent? Ops: A. O The average error between the model and the observed data B. The total error between the model and the observed data. C. The square-rooted average error between the model and the observed data. D. The squared total error between the model and the observed data: 0 21. Which one is the most desirable ou

Content Today at 5:10 PM That was fun, I wrote a 50-line long unit test that does multiple iterations checking different aspects of some convenience functions and while the test passed, was scratching my head as to why the breakpoint I had set to step through and double check them wasn't getting hit. Turns out MSVC analyzed my unit test, the preprocessor macros, and the inline functions it used, traced the entire control flow from start to finish and determined that there were no variables that could possibly result in any different outcome, and optimized the entire unit test down to a single return 0; I mean I guess that's validation that the logic is sound... Is that basically the compiler saying "trust me, bro"?