Am I Testing This Code... Or Is It Testing Me?

Content When your computer ERROR An error occurred. The Wizard must be stopped. Gives you a side-quest

Ah, the classic self-inflicted trolley problem! The code was working perfectly fine, but you just had to make it "cleaner" and "more elegant." Now you're frantically Slack messaging the team at 11 PM while production burns down. It's that special kind of self-destructive genius where you convince yourself that your unnecessary abstraction is somehow saving the codebase, right before you heroically break everything that was working. The philosophical trolley problem, but make it stupid - nobody was in danger until you decided to play code architect. Next time just write a comment and walk away. Trust me.

Someone in the library classification system woke up and chose violence. The Dewey Decimal System has filed software programming under "Unexplained Phenomena" and honestly, after debugging production for 15 years, I can't argue with that logic. Code works on my machine, fails in prod, passes all tests but crashes for one user in Nebraska—yeah, that's basically paranormal activity. At least they didn't put it under Fiction, though that would've been equally accurate.

The AUDACITY of the universe! One second you're sitting there, coffee in hand, with the PURE CONFIDENCE of a rockstar coder about to witness your masterpiece in action. The next second? BOOM! Your compiler SLAPS YOU IN THE FACE with more errors than there are stars in the galaxy! 900 errors from 800 lines?! That's like having MORE problems than actual code! The mathematical IMPOSSIBILITY of it all! Your computer isn't just telling you that you failed—it's telling you that you've somehow broken the LAWS OF PHYSICS with your terrible code! And yet... we'll fix one error and try again because we're GLUTTONS FOR PUNISHMENT! 💀

Content (DEV The Practical Dev thepracticaldev The feature where Atom slows down and crashes if I open a big file really helps me keep my code concise and my classes small 21:44 PM - 09 Mar 2017 9 17 409 1152

Content E Problem List E Description D Editorial Solutions Submissions 1614. Maximum Nesting Depth of the Parentheses Easy Topics A Companies 9 Hint A string is a valid parentheses string (denoted VPS) if it meets one of the following: It is an empty string "', or a single character not equal to " (" or ")", It can be written as AB ( A concatenated with B), where A and B are VPS's, or It can be written as (A) , where A is a VPS. We can similarly define the nesting depth depth (S) of any VPS S as follows: depth ("') 0 depth (C) 0, where C is a string with a single character not equal to " (" or ")" depth(A B) max(depth (A) , depth (B)), where A and B are VPS's. depth (" (" ")) 1 depth (A) , where A is a VPS. For example, a, "() ()", and "() (() ())" are VPS's (with nesting depths 0, 1, and 2), and ") (" and "(()" are not VPS's. Given a VPS represented as string S, return the nesting depth of Run g Submit ( Code Solved G Auto public class Solution public int MaxDepth(string 5) E Testcase Test Result Accepted untime: 93 ms Case 1 Case 2 Input " (1 (23) ( (8) 4))1" Output Expected Example 1: Input: s " (1 (23)( (8) 4))1" ProdrammerHumor.io