Twitter engineers in their code review with Elon

Content The ONLY ChatGPT guide you'll ever need Go from zero to pro with this ultimate ChatPT cheat sheet: If you like this, and want more Al cheat sheets, tutorials, tools, and updates, join Superhuman, my Al newsletter with 650K subscribers now: Ver traduccin ChatGPT Mastery Cheat Sheet Prompting Technique GPT 4 175 billion parameters GPT 3.5 Follion ChatGPT 4 is 36x more "powerful" than 3.5 Emotion Prompt Benchmark LLM 00 Advanced Prompts Few shots prompting How to select your LLM 3. Bench ark the candidate UMs oR Your dataset using relevant 10 BEST PLUGINS AITOOLS Copy writing ChatGPT Codina Essav Bloas Al Claude Academic Data Analysis Image summarization Web Browsina Bing AI G Bai A Claude Bard 80 1.600 ProdrammerHumor io 181 comentarios 245 veces compartido

Content Customer d'efects Yes we did bad code Programmers Shitty processtand Timelines a a 114 SRGRAFO

Google Gemini just gave the most "random" string in the history of random strings. Nothing says "I'm definitely not using a pattern" like literally using the alphabet followed by sequential numbers. That's like asking for a random password and getting "password123". Next they'll tell us their favorite dice roll is always 3.5.

Content Parents: Did you get a job? Me: GOLF JOB 404

Rust developers will literally fight the borrow checker for 6 hours straight, rewrite their entire codebase three times to satisfy the compiler's existential demands, and still come back screaming "I'VE GOT A MOUTH FULL OF CRABS!" like they just won the lottery. The crab is Rust's mascot (Ferris), and yes, Rustaceans are *that* enthusiastic about their language. They'll tell you about memory safety without garbage collection, fearless concurrency, and zero-cost abstractions while foaming at the mouth. Meanwhile, the rest of us are just trying to write a simple HTTP server without questioning our life choices. But hey, at least their code won't segfault at 2 AM in production... probably.

Ah, the classic "Epic Handshake" meme repurposed to show how data scientists and fashion industry professionals are secretly twins separated at birth. Both spend their days training models, identifying trends, and obsessing over the perfect fit. One group just does it with neural networks while the other does it with neural breakdowns during fashion week. The real difference? One gets paid to work with Python, the other with python skin handbags.