The Universal Programmer Stare

Content IF THE WORLD WAS CREATED BY A PROGRAMMER iN THE BEGINNING, THERE WAS THE HEAVEN AND THE EarTH BUT THE EARTH WAS FORMLESS AND BUGGY, WITHOUT DOCUMENTATION AND THE PROGRAMMER SAW THAT IT WAS NOT GOOD THEN YOU SAID "LET ThERE BE LIGHT! BUT THE LIGHT DId NOT COMPILE. On THE SECOND DAY, YOU MERGE WATER YOU CREATE A HACK SO TH AT LIGHT IS PAKI THE LANC TO CREATE DARKNESS, YoU NEED TO HIDE THE LAND, BUT THAT'S OK CAUSE CREATURES WON'T BE ADDED UNTIL LATER. AND STACKOVERFLOW SAID IT'S FINE BUT BECAUSE OF THE DEPENDENCY, LIGHT BREAKS AS IS ACCIDENTALL' LAND FLOODED YOU CHECK STACKOVERFLOW (IN THE DARKNESS) IT's THE ThIRD DAY. YOU TRY TO ADD CREATURES YOU ADD THEM IN THE TURNS OUT THE CREATURES IN THE DARKNESS, BUT BROWSER USING COOKIES, THERE'S NO LAND WITHOUT WHICH UNFORTUNATELY NEEDED TO BE ADDED SOONER MAKES THEM MORTAL BUT THe CLIent ForGoT to LIGHT, AND YOU CAN'T HAVE MENTION THAT LIGHT BECAUSE OF THE WATER IT'S THE FOURTH DAY. YOU DECIDE TO USE C YOU ALSO USE STL TO CREATE A BALLOON TURNS OUT THE ISSUES FOR ABSTRACTIONS AND THAT INFLATES THE EARTH IT WORKS OUT GREAT WERE CAUSED BY THE WITH COMPLICATIONS FLAT EARTH DESIGN WHATSOEVER! DANGLING POINTE IT'S ThE FIFtH daY YOU START ADDING PEOPLE TO HELP You. ON The SIXTH DAY YoU LoOK AT THE CHAOS YOU CREATED YOU DECIDE TO CREATE THEM IN YOUR LIKENESS, WHICH IS A MISTAKE LEFT -PAD. REACT THEY IMMEDIATELY POPULATE THE EARTH WITH HACKS, FADS AND UNNECESSARY JAVASCRIPT LIBRARIES REACT (FUCKIT.JS' le, YOU ATTEMPT TO LEAD PEOPLE BACK TO SENSIBLE PROGRAMMING, BUT IT IS TOO LATE- EVERYTHING RUNS ON DEPENDENCIES DAYTIMEAIR.JS HORIZON SEA.JS REALISTIC WAVES.JS BETTERBANKS.J BASE.JS SUND ON THE SEVENTH DAY YoU REALLY WANT To REST, BUT YOU NEED TO ORGANISE ALL You'vE CREATE OGGL.COM

BEHOLD THE EVOLUTION OF PROGRAMMING SKILL! From the left: actual coding with binary (0/1) and circuit boards like some kind of digital caveman. Middle: the revolutionary "just copy-paste from Stack Overflow" technique (Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V) that single-handedly saved our industry. And finally, the pinnacle of modern development—mastering the Tab key to make your stolen code look pretty! We've gone from building computers to basically just formatting other people's work. PROGRESS, DARLINGS! 💅

Content Programming exercise: Hello Visual Studio Code Points: 01 Please write a program which asks the user which editor they are using. The program should keep on asking until the user types in Visual Studio Code. Have a look at the example of expected behaviour below: Sample output Editor: Emacs not good Editor: Vim not good Editor: Word awful Editor: Atom not good Editor: Visual Studio Code an excellent choice!

Ah yes, the generational divide in heroism. Grandpa's out there in actual trenches with tanks, while we're fighting the good fight with print("Hello World") . Nothing says "saving humanity" quite like your first program that displays text on a screen. The bar has dropped so low you could trip over it, but hey – at least our debugging injuries are limited to carpal tunnel and eyestrain. War... war has changed. Now it's just us vs. syntax errors at 3 AM, heroically fueled by energy drinks and stackoverflow answers from 2011.

Content Q tolntO Description Converts a valid String to an integer. The input string should start with an integer number. If the string contains non-integer numbers, the function will stop performing the conversion. Syntax string.tolnt0 Parameters string: a variable of type String Returns long If no valid conversion could be performed because the string doesn't start with a integer number, a zero is returned.

The ultimate polymorphic relationship! Both Perl and C++ are saying they can do one thing in multiple ways, but for completely different reasons. Perl prides itself on the infamous "There's More Than One Way To Do It" philosophy where you can write the same function 47 different ways (and each one looks like your cat walked across the keyboard). Meanwhile, C++ is flexing its polymorphism muscles where you can override methods and have different implementations based on the object type. Both are technically correct, both will give you nightmares during code reviews. The perfect programming language love story doesn't exi—