The Invisible Teaching Assistants

What fresh hell is this? Someone decided to nest animations within animations, with timing functions that depend on each other, and then threw in boolean flags named "finished" and "finishedInside" because apparently we're writing code that doubles as an adult film script. This is the kind of animation code that makes you wake up at 3 AM six months later when the client reports that "sometimes the button jiggles wrong on Samsung devices but only on Tuesdays." The triple equality check is the cherry on top. Like, yes, let's make absolutely sure we're comparing the exact same type while the rest of this code is playing 4D chess with timing functions.

Content 00000000000000000000000690000 00000000000000000000000 WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ONP 1(n 2) 4 return false; for(int 2; 1 14(n 1 e 0) return false )00808000.00006000.00054009400000666905000

Content Send a CV Send a cV Interview with HR Get rejected Interview. S with developers Technical Interview Get rejected

Content vou learned programming for a job I learned programming to create a PS4 emulator and play Bloodborne on pc We are not the same

Content 99 LITTLE BUGS IN THE CODE, 99 LITTLE BUGS FIX ONE BUG, RUN ITAGAIN, 117 LITTLE BUGS IN THE CODE!

When the PM says "make sure your documentation is thorough," and you take it literally. Nothing says developer energy like documenting the painfully obvious while completely ignoring the complex parts of your codebase. "How to use this API? Figure it out yourself. How to open a pizza box? Let me write you a dissertation." Ten years in the industry and I've yet to see documentation that isn't either stating the absolute obvious or so cryptic it might as well be written in hieroglyphics. The middle ground simply doesn't exist in our universe.