Tell Me The Truth

Content MOVIES VS BEHIND THE SCENE Starting Attack. --Hacking NASA- Penetrating into the system.. Hacking NASA 20 Hacking NASA 40 Hacking NASA 60 Hacking NASA 80 Hacking NASA 100 NASA Hacked Successfully .............. print ("Starting Attack. print ("- -Hacking NASA--") print ("Penetrating into the system...") print ("Hacking NASA 20") print ("Hacking NASA 40") print ("Hacking NASA 60") print ("HackERS WASA 8034) print ("Hacking NASA 100") print ("NASA Hacked Successfully") Movies BEHIND THE SCENE

The first part of this authentication function is actually doing its job—checking if the password matches. But then comes the security masterpiece: if (true == true) . Congratulations, you've created the digital equivalent of a bouncer who checks your ID and then lets you in anyway because "yep, gravity still works!" This function will authenticate literally anyone who gets past the first check... or fails it and just keeps trying. Security experts hate this one weird trick!

Content UCISteve - are you still having issues? Tuesday, June 16, 2015 9:36 PM Reply Quote Propose as answer Vote Joseph Idziorek Microsoft (MST) 3,895 Points I gave up because I ran out of things to try. 0 Vote Marked as answer by Guy Haycock MST Microsoft employee, Owner Wednesday, June 24, 2015 4:52 PM Wednesday, June 17, 2015 5:25 PM Reply Quote UCISteve 0 Points

Junior dev proudly announces they "fixed all compiler warnings today" and the senior dev's response is just *chef's kiss* levels of unenthusiastic approval. That "I don't care, but... yay" perfectly captures the energy of someone who's seen too many juniors suppress warnings instead of actually fixing them, or worse, just slap @SuppressWarnings on everything like it's hot sauce. Because let's be real—"fixed" could mean anything from actually refactoring deprecated code to just adding // @ts-ignore comments everywhere. The senior dev has been burned before and knows that "fixed warnings" often translates to "created technical debt I'll have to deal with in 6 months." But hey, at least the build log is cleaner now, right? Right?

Content rprogrammer Posted by uI - "2 hours ago vote If you read documentation you aren't a real programmer Reading documentation is basically just copying someone else code. You can figure out everything you need with simple arithmetic and loops. 2 Comments " Award ( Share Comment as PlasticAd7436 What are your thoughts? Markdown Mode Comment Sort By: Best Y PlasticAd7436 just now rProgrammerHumor 1 Saves samara o ProdrammerHumor.io rprogrammer A community for programmers; discussion of programming and programming news. Join us on Discord - httos:discord.gg TB6HZ74ndm Created Oct 21, 2008 9.1k Members h Online Joined Community options rprogrammer Rules 1. Low-Effort Post

Modern problems require modern solutions! This dev is playing 5D chess with AI - opening tabs for ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and DeepSeek to ask them all the exact same coding question. Then the real programming begins: copy-paste each AI's answer into separate Python files, run them all, and cherry-pick the winner. It's basically Hunger Games for AI models. The ultimate "why debug your own code when you can make five AIs fight to the death for the correct solution?" approach. Bonus points for efficiency - why spend hours on Stack Overflow when you can delegate your decision paralysis to multiple neural networks simultaneously?