Should've Kept It To Yourself Buddy

Content Please give application parameters We want a blue line with red ink Oh and 7 lines all perpendicular to everything

Content ME, READING RUST DOCUMENTATION SO I CAN MAKE INFORMED AND FACTUAL MEMES ABOUT WHY IT SUCKS

Content Am i missing something important here? No, it's the previous devs who are wrong

Content Have you tried killing the process AND all of its children? STEPHE KING'S IT

That beautiful moment when you've closed all your IDE tabs, pushed your commits, and are mentally halfway to happy hour... then your Slack explodes with "Critical update: ALL HANDS ON." The universe has a special talent for waiting until you've mentally checked out before dropping production fires in your lap. It's like the code knows you're smiling and decides "not today, friend." Freedom was so close you could taste it. Now you're being dragged back into the trenches for an emergency that will inevitably be traced back to someone's "minor change" that "shouldn't affect anything."

RIGHT JOIN is the awkward middle child of SQL joins that nobody invited to the party. Sure, it does the exact same thing as LEFT JOIN—just swap the table order and boom, you're done. But nooo, some masochist decided to write it backwards and make everyone's brain hurt. Why would you ever use RIGHT JOIN when you can just flip the tables in the FROM clause and use LEFT JOIN like a civilized human being? It's like insisting on walking backwards to your destination. Technically possible, functionally identical, but deeply unsettling to witness. Database developers have collectively agreed that RIGHT JOIN exists purely to confuse junior devs during code reviews. If you see one in production code, either someone's playing 4D chess or they just hate their teammates.