Programmers Following Instructions

Content The Only Comment of The Code Dear maintainer: When I wrote this code, only I and God knew what it was. Now, only God knows! So if you are done trying to 'optimize' this routine (and failed), please increment the following counter as a warning to the next guy: totalhourswastedhere 67

Content SENIOR DEVS NEW GUY SENIOR DEVS WHY THE FUCK IS CURRENT TIME SET TO NULL NEW GUY SENIOR DEVS WHY THE FUCK IS THE BUTTON VISIBILITY BOUND TO THE EMAIL ADDRESS? TINEW GUY WHY THE FCK DO WE CALL BASE64ENCO TWICE??

Content Entry level Job advertisement Junior devs 10 years experience in 38 different languages

Content der Hausmeister Dear Users These devices have low 10 throughput. If you are making a large bulk insert please be considerate and adjust your batch size to commit multiple transactions. Thank you. The hostmeister

Content Ci. C:Windowssystem32cmd.exe Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time31ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time32ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time30m TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time30m TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time30ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time31ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time38ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time32ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time29ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time28ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time30ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time30m TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time34ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time31ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time32ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time40ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time30ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time54ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time26ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time29ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time28ms TTL57 Reply from 10.18.1.30: bytes32 time30ms TTL57 Whoopsie Doodle! Ping statistics for 10.18.1.30: Packets: Sent 104766, Received 104591, Lost 175 (0 loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum Oms, Maximum 863ms, Average 27ms Control-C C

Ah yes, the Y10K problem - the sequel nobody asked for! Future devs will be sobbing in their space pods because some genius in 2023 thought "four digits ought to be enough for anybody." Imagine having to refactor billions of lines of legacy code across the galaxy because nobody considered humans might still be writing terrible code 8,000 years from now. The exhausted expression says it all - "I could've been a space poet, but instead I'm patching date formats on Martian ATMs." History repeats itself, just with more digits.