Maximum Rick Hursive Depth Exceeded

Content my linkedin profile R, python, javascript, shiny, dplyr, purrr, ditto, ggplot, d3, canvas, spark, sawk, pyspark, sparkly, lodash, lazy, bootstrap, jupyter, vulpix, git, flask, numpy, pandas, feebas, scikit, pm, bayes, h2o.ai, sparkling-water, tensorflow, keras, onyx, ekans, hadoop, scala, unity, metapod, gc, cllc, krebase, neoj, hadoop. I typically ask recruiters to point out which of these are pokemon.

The eternal cycle of game development hell, illustrated through Omni-Man's bloody lecture. That moment when management keeps throwing money at broken, unfinished ports instead of giving devs proper time to finish the product. Just another day in the industry where the "ship now, patch later" mentality reigns supreme. Meanwhile, QA testers sit in the corner, reports ignored, muttering "I literally warned you about this exact bug three months ago."

Content When your computer says: you don't have permission to edit this file: Down you!

Ah, the classic "career path" in tech—where senior devs push juniors off cliffs with nothing but a cheerful "You can do it!" and some links to Stack Overflow answers from 2011. The gap between "here's your promotion" and "here's some tutorials" is approximately the same as the gap between your confidence during the job interview and your first day actually writing production code. Nothing says "mentorship" quite like watching someone crash spectacularly into reality while you shout documentation links from a safe distance. Welcome to software development, where we don't have onboarding—we have gravity.

Content Always has been Wait, it's all spaghetti

The infamous "2! = 2" equation creates a perfect divide between two worlds. In mathematics, the factorial operator (!) means "multiply by all positive integers less than or equal to this number" - so 2! equals 2×1=2. Correct! Mathematicians nod in agreement. But programmers see something entirely different. In code, "!=" is the inequality operator meaning "not equal to." So "2 != 2" is a blatantly false statement that evaluates to false/0/no. The compiler would laugh if it could. The spacing (or lack thereof) is the silent villain in this syntax tragedy. One tiny space would have prevented this interdisciplinary conflict!