How Do I Compile This PDF Artifact

So you'll agonize over whether a variable should be userData , userInfo , or userDataObject for two hours, consulting Clean Code and three senior devs... but your neighbor just casually drops "Silence of the LANs" and "Tell my Wi-Fi love her" without breaking a sweat. Meanwhile, you're still debating camelCase vs snake_case while they're out here creating masterpieces like "Martin Router King" and "The LAN Before Time." They've got more creativity in their router settings than you've had in your entire codebase. The real kicker? Their naming convention is probably more memorable than your perfectly semantic fetchUserDataFromDatabaseAndTransformToDTO function that you spent half a sprint naming.

Content python ) , lava C RATOR

The evolution from peasant to deity, visualized. Using a cursor? Cute, your brain is on standby. VS Code lights up a few neurons with its IntelliSense and extensions. Then vim/emacs users enter the chat with their galaxy brain energy, thinking they've achieved enlightenment because they memorized 47 keyboard shortcuts to exit a file. But the final boss? Writing code on a whiteboard and using OCR to digitize it. That's not coding anymore—that's performance art. You're basically telling your IDE "I don't even need you to exist" while your brain operates at frequencies only visible to the Hubble telescope. No autocomplete, no syntax highlighting, just raw algorithmic thinking and the faint hope that your handwriting doesn't make the OCR have an existential crisis. Honestly, the whiteboard + OCR crowd probably writes bug-free code on the first try because they've transcended mortal concerns like "testing" and "compilation errors."

Content LOUDER CROWD LOUDER CROWDER Doctors are just debuggers for humans CHANGE MY MIND

Content What side are you on: as iterable 55 as iterable made with memat

Content 3rd - Follow Software Engineer 3d 4 In 2021 a research paper was published showing most efficient programming languages. Paper is here, but sadly behind the paywall. Gotta love "free academic pursuit" where they take in public money and then hide the results. https:Inkd.ingFTCtMzU Anyway: It shows that if people care about energy footprint of their systems, they need to ditch things like ruby, python and perl. Typescript also is super inefficient too. (e) C (e) Rust (e) C (e) Ada (v) Java (e) Pascal (c) Chapel (v) Lisp (c) Ocaml (c) Fortran (e) Swift (c) Haskell (v) C (e) Go (i) Dart (v) F 6) JavaScript (v) Racket (i) TypeScript (i) Hack 6) PHP (v) Erlang G) Lua (i) Jruby G) Ruby G) Python G) Perl Energy 1.00 1.03 1.34 1.70 1.98 2.14 2.18 2.27 2.40 2.52 2.79 3.10 3.14 3.23 3.83 4.13 4.45 7.91 21.50 24.02 29.30 42.23 45.98 46.54 69.91 75.88 79.58 (c) C (c) Rust (e) C (e) Ada (v) Java (c) Chapel (c) Go (c) Pascal (c) Ocaml (v) C (v) Lisp (c) Haskell (c) Swift (c) Fortran (v) F (i) JavaScript () Dart (v) Racket (i) Hack G) PHP (v) Erlang (i) Jruby () TypeScript (i) Ruby G) Perl (i) Python (i) Lua Time 1.00 1.04 1.56 1.85 1.89 2.14 2.83 3.02 3.09 3.14 3.40 3.55 4.20 4.20 6.30 6.52 6.67 11.27 26.99 27.64 36.71 43.44 46.20 59.34 65.79 71.90 82.91 (c) Pascal (e) Go (e) C (c) Fortran (c) C (c) Ada (c) Rust (v) Lisp (c) Haskell G PHP (c) Swift (i) Python (c) Ocaml (v) C (i) Hack (v) Racket (i) Ruby (c) Chapel (v) F (i) JavaScript (i) 'TypeScript (v) Java G Perl (i) Lua (v) Erlang (i) Dart (i) Jruby Mb 1.00 1.05 1.17 1.24 1.34 1.47 1.54 1.92 2.45 2.57 2.71, 2.803 2.82 2.85 3.34 3.52 3.97 4.00 4.25 4.59 4.69 6.01 6.62 6.72 7.20 8.64 19.84 gO 56 23 comments 6 reposts