But The Answers Are 💯 Correct

Content 1st Year of Ct 10th Year of C

Ah, the classic StackOverflow NaN test debate! Someone wrote a beautifully elegant isNaN() function that simply checks if a number isn't equal to itself ( num != num ), which is actually brilliant because that's the only time equality fails in JavaScript/Python. But then some principled developer comes along and declares it "prohibited witchcraft" despite admitting it works perfectly. This is coding purity culture at its finest. "Yes, your three-line solution works flawlessly, but I'm morally obligated to insist you use the official 50-line implementation with seventeen edge cases instead." The real witchcraft is how StackOverflow manages to turn elegant solutions into religious debates since 2009.

Content When you thought you made an efficient algorithm but it's actually On!?) (confused unga bunga)

Content mewtru trunarla I can't believe so many software engineers work at Netflix. What do they even do, the product's already built?!

The perfect illustration of irony in its natural habitat. First post: "There are 2 types of stupid people - those who can't read and those who won't follow instructions." Second post: Someone who clearly didn't grasp that computers don't work through formal introductions. The reply is pure gold - introducing your printer to your webcam like they're at a networking event? Putting name tags on them? This is exactly what happens when someone takes "computer recognition" a bit too literally. And they wonder why tech support drinks heavily.

Content Developer: Develops dating app His girlfriend: Cheats on him by using his developed app Developer: made with mematic ProarammerHumor.io