Tech twitter Memes

Someone asked engineers to name every computer ever, and Richard took it literally . Instead of listing actual computer names, he wrote a loop that iterates through all computers and sets each one's name to "ever". Technically correct? Absolutely. Useful? Not even slightly. It's the classic malicious compliance meets literal interpretation. The spec said "name every computer ever" and by god, every computer is now named "ever". Requirements met, ticket closed, PR approved. Don't blame the engineer—blame whoever wrote that ambiguous spec without acceptance criteria. This is why we can't have nice things in software development. And why product managers wake up screaming at 3 AM.

The tech world's most pointless debate that somehow causes more arguments than tabs vs spaces. Is it "day-ta" or "dah-ta"? The answer depends entirely on whether you went to school in the US or literally anywhere else on the planet. Liam's response is gold because your brain automatically reads both pronunciations differently in the same sentence. It's like that GIF/JIF war, except nobody's built an entire career around being pretentious about data pronunciation... yet. Fun fact: The Latin origin "datum" suggests "dah-ta" is technically more correct, but good luck explaining etymology to your PM during standup when they ask about the "day-ta pipeline."

Julia Turc just opened Pandora's box by asking for a name for "not-vibe-coding" and the dev community delivered. The suggestions range from "boomer coding" (when you actually read documentation), "chewgy coding" (painfully outdated but somehow still works), "trad coding" (traditional, no frameworks, just suffering), to the absolute winner: "Coding with capital C" - you know, the kind where you actually plan things out, write tests, and don't just YOLO your way through production. But Gabor Varadi swoops in with the nuclear option: just call it "software engineering" in quotes. The air quotes do all the heavy lifting here - implying that what we call "vibe coding" is... well... not exactly engineering. It's the programming equivalent of "I'm not like other coders, I actually care about architecture and maintainability." The beautiful irony? Most of us toggle between vibe coding at 2 AM ("this will definitely work") and capital-C Coding during code reviews ("who wrote this garbage? Oh wait, that was me").

Someone finally said it. While everyone's out here calling themselves "coders" and doing "coding bootcamps," there's this one person who had to remind us that the proper term is "programming." Because apparently "coding" has become the TikTok-ified version of what we do—like calling yourself a "content creator" instead of "unemployed with a Ring light." The suggestions for "not-vibe-coding" are pure gold though. "Boomer coding" hits different when you realize half of us still write code like it's 1995. "Chewgy coding" for that millennial energy of over-engineering everything. "Trad coding" for when you refuse to use frameworks and insist on writing everything from scratch. And "Coding with capital C" is just chef's kiss—because if you're gonna gatekeep, might as well go full grammatical pedant. But the reply? *Chef's kiss intensifies.* Declaring "coding" an infantilizing word and anointing "programming" as the noble profession is the kind of pretentious energy that makes you simultaneously roll your eyes and nod in agreement. We're not just slapping semicolons together, we're *engineering solutions*. Or at least that's what we tell ourselves at 3 AM debugging a null pointer exception.

Ah, the eternal struggle between "vibe coding" and actual software engineering. Someone's looking for a fun name for writing code with proper standards and discipline, and the reply just cuts straight to the truth bomb: it's called "software engineering" – you know, that boring thing we were all hired to do before we discovered keyboard RGB lighting and lofi beats to code to. The "Coding with capital C" suggestion is particularly painful because we all know that person who treats variable naming like an existential crisis. Meanwhile, actual production code continues to run on caffeine, Stack Overflow copies, and the tears of whoever has to maintain it next.