Trump New Tariff V2 V3 Final New Final Real New Final

The eternal war between math and code in one factorial joke! In programming, 2! is just a very excited 2 (or a boolean NOT applied twice, returning the original value). But for mathematicians, 2! is factorial notation meaning 2×1=2. The programmer's horrified "No" versus the mathematician's smug "Yes" perfectly captures why we can never have nice things in cross-disciplinary meetings. And why commenting your code matters—unless you enjoy watching your math friends have aneurysms during code reviews.

Content 3rd - Follow Software Engineer 3d 4 In 2021 a research paper was published showing most efficient programming languages. Paper is here, but sadly behind the paywall. Gotta love "free academic pursuit" where they take in public money and then hide the results. https:Inkd.ingFTCtMzU Anyway: It shows that if people care about energy footprint of their systems, they need to ditch things like ruby, python and perl. Typescript also is super inefficient too. (e) C (e) Rust (e) C (e) Ada (v) Java (e) Pascal (c) Chapel (v) Lisp (c) Ocaml (c) Fortran (e) Swift (c) Haskell (v) C (e) Go (i) Dart (v) F 6) JavaScript (v) Racket (i) TypeScript (i) Hack 6) PHP (v) Erlang G) Lua (i) Jruby G) Ruby G) Python G) Perl Energy 1.00 1.03 1.34 1.70 1.98 2.14 2.18 2.27 2.40 2.52 2.79 3.10 3.14 3.23 3.83 4.13 4.45 7.91 21.50 24.02 29.30 42.23 45.98 46.54 69.91 75.88 79.58 (c) C (c) Rust (e) C (e) Ada (v) Java (c) Chapel (c) Go (c) Pascal (c) Ocaml (v) C (v) Lisp (c) Haskell (c) Swift (c) Fortran (v) F (i) JavaScript () Dart (v) Racket (i) Hack G) PHP (v) Erlang (i) Jruby () TypeScript (i) Ruby G) Perl (i) Python (i) Lua Time 1.00 1.04 1.56 1.85 1.89 2.14 2.83 3.02 3.09 3.14 3.40 3.55 4.20 4.20 6.30 6.52 6.67 11.27 26.99 27.64 36.71 43.44 46.20 59.34 65.79 71.90 82.91 (c) Pascal (e) Go (e) C (c) Fortran (c) C (c) Ada (c) Rust (v) Lisp (c) Haskell G PHP (c) Swift (i) Python (c) Ocaml (v) C (i) Hack (v) Racket (i) Ruby (c) Chapel (v) F (i) JavaScript (i) 'TypeScript (v) Java G Perl (i) Lua (v) Erlang (i) Dart (i) Jruby Mb 1.00 1.05 1.17 1.24 1.34 1.47 1.54 1.92 2.45 2.57 2.71, 2.803 2.82 2.85 3.34 3.52 3.97 4.00 4.25 4.59 4.69 6.01 6.62 6.72 7.20 8.64 19.84 gO 56 23 comments 6 reposts

Content Oh, you are a programmer? Pick your class: TE PROGRAMMING Windows Server 2003 NORIA NOKIA Parabolasnu libreboo', TOr 8000 WindowsXP HTML Microsoft net searx M MONERO programming since 12 FRONTEND JS 300 commits per day A archlinux ELECTRON ProarammerHumor.io COFFE rE PROGRAMMING MONSTE g - Technology

Content filter similar.py testwhash.py import pywt import cV2 import numpy as np import os import shutil import math import json TODO: hake this work test whash.py 19 5 6 7 8 g 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 def wash(img, level1): img cv2.resize(img, (8, 8)) gray cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.C pixels np.asarray(gray) 25! coeffs pywt ,wavedec2(pixels, approx coeffs(0 255 median np. median (approx) hash

Someone enthusiastically introduces their favorite language, and JavaScript immediately demonstrates why it's both loved and mocked in equal measure. The plus operator does string concatenation ("11" + 1 = "111"), while the minus operator coerces to numbers ("11" - 1 = 10). Totally logical and not confusing at all. JavaScript's type coercion is like that friend who tries to be helpful but just makes everything worse. The language sees a plus sign and thinks "maybe they want strings?" but sees a minus sign and goes "definitely numbers here." It's the programming equivalent of a chaotic neutral alignment.

Content WHEN FRONT END WAS CREATED FASTER.