It's Going To Be A Free Upgrade LOL

Ah yes, the highly scientific comparison between AMD and NVIDIA where the only metric is... *checks notes*... the number in the product name. Groundbreaking research showing that 6900 is indeed larger than 3090. Next up: shocking revelation that RTX 4090 absolutely destroys both in this revolutionary benchmark. Hardware enthusiasts in shambles right now.

The evolution of GPU power requirements is getting ridiculous. Remember when a simple 6-pin connector was enough? Now NVIDIA's over here like "Your new graphics card requires *checks notes* breadboard jumper wires and direct access to your local power plant." Next gen they'll just skip the middleman and require you to build a small nuclear reactor in your basement. The RGB lighting alone will probably require its own dedicated circuit breaker.

Ah, Best Buy bringing back the Y2K38 apocalypse warnings. That sticker is telling you to shut down your computer before 03:14:07 on January 19, 2038 – when 32-bit Unix timestamps roll over and potentially brick everything running on them. Just like Y2K but with fewer panic bunkers and more GitHub issues. At this point, I'm more worried about my code from last sprint than some timestamp issue 14 years from now. Though I'm impressed anyone thinks my ThinkPad will still boot by then.

The joke here is that 60,000 rows is an absolutely tiny dataset in modern data engineering. Like, microscopic. A competent data engineer could process this on a 10-year-old laptop while running a YouTube video in the background. It's like bragging that your car overheated after driving to the end of your driveway. Any data pipeline that can't handle 60K rows without hardware failure is the computational equivalent of a paper airplane trying to carry passengers across the Atlantic. Real data engineers regularly process billions of rows without breaking a sweat. This is why everyone's laughing - it's the equivalent of someone claiming to be a weightlifting champion because they can lift a gallon of milk.

The eternal battle between marketing and reality. Hard drive manufacturers use 1MB = 1000KB to make their products seem bigger (931GB of actual storage when you buy a "1TB" drive), while the rest of the computing world knows 1MB = 1024KB. It's like ordering a dozen donuts and getting 10 because "our definition of dozen is more convenient for our profit margins." The bell curve shows most people understand the correct definition, but marketing departments and those who believe them occupy the tails of blissful ignorance.

OMG, the AUDACITY of some developers! 💀 Instead of fixing their horrifically inefficient spaghetti code, they just throw more RAM and faster CPUs at the problem like that's going to save their algorithmic sins! Honey, your O(n²) monstrosity isn't going to magically become O(log n) just because you bought a shiny new processor. It's like putting a Ferrari engine in a shopping cart and expecting it to win Formula 1. The hardware might be faster, but your code is still a dumpster fire wrapped in a tragedy!