Whatareyougonnado

The battle-hardened Senior Dev, riddled with arrows from every direction (missed deadlines, customer complaints, manager whining about slow devs), still finds time to encourage the Junior Dev with a cheerful "Nice PR. You are doing great so far!" It's the perfect metaphor for tech leadership—absorbing all the projectiles of corporate chaos while shielding the newbies from the full horror of production. That armor isn't just for show; it's built from years of git conflicts and Stack Overflow searches!

That moment when your code review turns into an interrogation session. "I see you've implemented this feature without documentation... interesting . Now, before I approve your PR, tell me what you thought about that React conference keynote? Didn't catch it? What a shame. Looks like this merge might take a while..." The dark side of open source maintainers that GitHub doesn't want you to see.

The eternal tech interview charade! HR asks if you have Git experience, and there's Stewie confidently declaring he knows the sacred trio of commands: "git add .", "git commit -m", and "git push origin master". The punchline? He genuinely believes these three commands make him a Git expert. It's like saying you're a master chef because you can boil water and add salt. Every developer has been there - memorizing just enough commands to sound competent while secretly Googling "how to undo git commit" the moment something breaks. The audacity to claim "Yes, I think I understand the nuances of this profession" is peak junior developer energy!

The eternal saga of code reviews in one Slack message. Dude casually drops "i think cursor fixed it, can i merge?" and gets absolutely 875 replies of people tearing his code apart. That's not a code review—that's a digital intervention! Guarantee those replies are filled with "Actually..." and "Well, technically..." comments dissecting his cursor fix like it's a murder scene. Pro tip: never ask if you can merge unless you're prepared for your colleagues to discover every sin you've committed since learning to code.

When the junior dev runs git push --force and the entire codebase history gets obliterated. That exit sign is basically your team's sanity making a swift departure. Seven years of commit history? Gone. Just like those doors. This is why we have code reviews and branch protection rules, folks. Not because we don't trust you, but because we've all been that person who thought "yeah, I know what I'm doing" right before disaster struck.

The formal frog has entered a new circle of development hell. That moment when a senior dev slides into your DMs with a "quick question" about your PR, and suddenly you're staring at 13,000 downvotes worth of technical debt that someone wants YOU to fix. The green +2,533 represents the handful of sympathetic souls who understand your pain, completely dwarfed by the red sea of "nope" from everyone who knows better than to touch that radioactive codebase. Welcome to git blame roulette, where the prize is becoming the new owner of legacy code nobody has understood since 2014.