Literally Me Going Through A Colleague's Repo

Ah, the ancient IT support psychological warfare technique! Instead of embarrassing users with the classic "is it plugged in?" question (which it never is), this genius IT veteran gives them a dignified escape route. "Unplug the cable, blow on it dramatically like it's a Nintendo cartridge from 1992, and plug it back in." Pure brilliance! The user gets to pretend they're performing critical maintenance rather than admitting they never plugged the damn thing in to begin with. It's the tech support equivalent of letting someone "find" their glasses on top of their own head. Kindness through deception - the cornerstone of all healthy IT-user relationships!

Content G Closed miku-chan03 opened this issue on 18 Oct 2017 2 comments miku-chan03 commented on 18 Oct 2017 Contributor Hil 1 fixie wixied the JSON-api fucksy wucksiell! pp I repwaced the Prototypes. func wiff a more -streamlined- kawaii Pwototypiee. funkywunks object that make the JS go sooper dooper fast!! XD starts twerking Can u pwease merge my pull wequest senpai?!! UwU gaearon commented on 19 Oct 2017 Contributor what in the name of fuck gaearon closed this permanently on 19 Oct 2017

So they literally put the verification code right there in the message. You know, the one you're supposed to enter to prove you received it. The whole point of 2FA is that an attacker who doesn't have access to your phone can't log in... but if they intercept this message, they can just read the code without needing to actually receive it on the device. It's like putting a lock on your door and then leaving the key taped to the lock with a note saying "this is the key." Security theater at its finest. Someone's product manager probably said "let's make it more user-friendly" and the security team just quietly wept into their coffee.

Content Me: implementing a small easter-egg in the app The client after finding it: THAT'S A PENIS imgfip.com

Content UNNECESSARY MEMORY ALLOCATIONS

The stark contrast between C++ development experiences couldn't be more dramatic. On Linux, it's all sunshine and rainbows—a delightful adventure where your code compiles without mysterious errors and dependencies actually make sense. Meanwhile, C++ on Windows transforms you into a hardened noir detective, chain-smoking through the night as you investigate why your perfectly valid code is being accused of crimes it didn't commit. The cigarette isn't for style—it's a coping mechanism for dealing with Visual Studio's cryptic error messages and DLL hell. No wonder Windows C++ developers look like they've seen things... terrible things.