Rip Firefox: When Promises Get Deleted In A Commit

Welcome to the Linux kernel's GitHub page, where the pull requests are apparently doubling as Tinder profiles. Nothing says "I understand open source contribution" like announcing your relationship status in a PR title. What's next? "Fixed memory leak, also I do CrossFit"? "Optimized driver code, btw I'm vegan"? "Patched security vulnerability, anyone want to see my cat pics?" And 504 open PRs? Linus must be having an aneurysm somewhere. The only thing getting merged here is desperation with code.

Running git blame is like opening Pandora's box of workplace drama! You start all confident thinking "I'll find who wrote this garbage" only to discover it was YOUR BOSS all along. That moment when your face transitions from detective to absolute horror as you realize you're about to refactor code written by the person who signs your paychecks. Time to quietly close the terminal and pretend you never saw anything... 🙈

That brief moment of joy when you spot a well-documented PR, only to realize it's from last year and the next one is just as cryptic as ever. The eternal cycle continues. Next year's documentation will be amazing though, right? Narrator: It was not. We all make those New Year's resolutions to document better, but by January 15th we're back to commit messages like "fixed stuff" and PRs with the detailed description of "it works now."

That moment when GitHub Copilot helpfully suggests your private API key that you accidentally committed to a repo six months ago. Nothing like having your $5000/month AWS bill exposed by an AI that's just trying to be helpful. Security through obscurity fails again.

When your PR shows "-9,953" lines of code and your manager gives you a thumbs up. Nothing says "senior developer" like knowing what code not to write. The most efficient code is the code that doesn't exist. Somewhere a project manager is frantically updating their burndown chart while wondering how to report "negative progress" to stakeholders.

Ah, the sacred GitHub contribution graph—where the greenness of your squares matters more than your actual skills! This marketing person just proved that tech hiring is basically a casino where the house edge is "having a pretty heat map." Forget degrees, experience, or actual coding ability—just make sure your contribution graph looks like a well-maintained lawn. $900k for a pretty pattern of green squares? Meanwhile, actual developers are frantically pushing commits to empty repos at 11:59 PM just to keep their streaks alive. The ultimate tech industry cheat code: don't learn to code, just learn to look like you code. Absolutely brilliant.