Monorepos Before It Was Cool

When your dating life is so broken you file it as a GitHub issue. Classic developer move—thinking social interactions can be debugged with a pull request. "Women's profiles don't answer when I text them. Please fix this problem." Yeah buddy, that's definitely a code issue and not the fact that your opening line was probably "Hello World" followed by a request for her SQL. The best part? It's issue #412—meaning there were 411 previous complaints about the same "bug." Maybe try catching some social skills instead of exceptions.

Spotify Wrapped, but for developers' existential crises. The four horsemen of development reality: fixing bugs that spawn more bugs, spending 23.6 hours automating a 5.4-hour task, denying your code is the problem (narrator: it was), and watching six hours of tutorials only to find the solution in some random blog comment from 2011. The metrics don't lie, but they do hurt.

The coding hierarchy of life, beautifully illustrated through Noah's Ark. At the top, we've got StackOverflow - the mighty elephant carrying us all. The giraffe reaching for those YouTube tutorials when all else fails. Meanwhile, documentation sits there like a wise old man nobody listens to. Then there's the middle tier: GitHub code (somewhat reliable), professor's code (theoretical at best), your friend's code (questionable but free), and your actual code (we don't talk about that). But when the client shows up? Suddenly that horrific amalgamation of duct tape and prayers you call "working code" becomes your prize exhibit. And the client, bless their heart, still asks "what the hell is this?" - as if they expected actual software engineering instead of the digital equivalent of a panic attack.

Who needs Dropbox when you've got unlimited repos? The real GitHub pro move isn't collaboration—it's exploiting that sweet, sweet free storage. Nothing says "senior developer" like having a private repo called "vacation_pics_2023" with 500 commits that are just JPEGs of your dog at the beach. GitHub staff probably wondering why someone needs to version control 8GB of wedding photos with commit messages like "final_final_ACTUALLY_FINAL.jpg".

The pot calling the kettle black has never been so ironic. Software engineers spend half their careers staring at legacy code muttering "who wrote this garbage?" before checking git blame and discovering it was themselves three months ago. The sacred ritual of cursing your predecessors' code is basically our version of a stand-up meeting - mandatory and therapeutic. Next time you're refactoring some unholy mess, remember: somewhere, an electrician is looking at your home wiring thinking the exact same thing.

When you've been staring at your code for 8 hours straight and just want to be done with it... nothing beats a physical "git push" button. Just slam that thing and pray your tests pass in CI. Because sometimes, committing code isn't just a command—it's an emotional release. The harder you push the button, the more likely your merge request gets approved. It's science.