Git Commit M Please Work This Time

The git diff shows Firefox quietly removing their FAQ entry that promised "Nope. Never have, never will" regarding selling personal data. Nothing says "trust us with your privacy" like deleting the promise that you'd protect it! Looks like the fox might be heading to the same data-selling farm where all those other browsers went. Pour one out for the last non-Chrome browser that pretended to care.

The first comment: "When I do git blame, it's not about finding the person who did the mistake. I want to find out when the code was added, which task it was related to, and if I need more details, the person who wrote the code." The reply: "I use git blame just to make sure it wasn't me before I go on a tirade..." Ah yes, the two types of developers. The professional who uses tools for their intended purpose, and the rest of us who just want plausible deniability before ranting in Slack. Nothing quite like that moment of relief when you discover someone else wrote that abomination, followed by the crushing realization it was actually you from three years ago.

BEHOLD! The magical power of git rebase master - where problems don't get solved, they get ERASED FROM EXISTENCE! 💀 One second you've got a person lying on the tracks about to be OBLITERATED by the trolley of doom, and the next? POOF! They've vanished faster than my will to live during a merge conflict! The trolley problem isn't a problem if you just rewrite history to make it look like there was never anyone on the tracks to begin with! Who needs ethics when you have force push privileges? NOT ME, DARLING! 💅

The modern developer's digital mirror match! GitHub Copilot is shaking hands with itself in the ultimate AI narcissism loop. When your code assistant both writes and reviews your code, it's basically just patting itself on the back. "Great job me, I approve of what I wrote!" This is peak programming efficiency—why waste time having humans review code when the robot can just high-five itself? The circle of AI life is complete. Next up: GitHub Copilot creating pull requests for problems it invented while reviewing its own code.

The year is 2070. Flying cars exist. We've colonized Mars. Quantum computing powers everything. But the Linux kernel? Still not "vibe code." Some poor maintainer is getting a pull request rejected because Linus doesn't think their commit messages spark joy. 50 years from now and we'll still be using git, still dealing with legacy code from the 90s, and still arguing about tabs vs spaces. The more technology advances, the more kernel development stays exactly the same.

Ah, the classic "green squares at any cost" syndrome. Nothing says "I'm a serious developer" like obsessively committing README formatting changes 30 times an hour just to make your GitHub contribution graph look like a lush rainforest. What you're witnessing is the digital equivalent of a peacock's mating dance - except instead of attracting mates, you're desperately trying to impress potential employers who might glance at your profile for 2.7 seconds. Trust me, after 20 years in this industry, I can tell you that no one has ever been hired because they had perfect markdown indentation in their README. But hey, at least your contribution graph looks like you've been coding like a maniac while you were actually just adding and removing spaces.