Do What I Say, Not What Is Safe

The unholy trinity of "rapid development" is on full display! The tweet claims Git, JavaScript, and Microsoft BASIC were all created in under a week—which is hilariously wrong and the perfect setup for the three-headed dragon meme below. Two fierce dragon heads represent Git and BASIC—powerful tools that required significant development time. But that third head? JavaScript with its derpy eyes and tongue sticking out perfectly captures how JS was indeed cobbled together in 10 days by Brendan Eich in 1995. Fun fact: Linus Torvalds spent months creating Git after the BitKeeper controversy, and BASIC took significant development at Microsoft. Meanwhile, JavaScript—despite being slapped together in a mad rush to compete with Java—somehow powers most of the modern web. Proof that sometimes the derpy dragon wins!

The eternal Git confession we all make but never admit to. You know that moment when you've been wrestling with merge conflicts for two hours, documentation is just a suggestion, and suddenly git push -f starts looking like a completely reasonable life choice? That's this meme in its purest form. The "it" being pushed is both the code AND the responsibility for whatever chaos ensues. The typo in "JUSTR" is just *chef's kiss* - perfectly representing the frantic energy of someone who's about to nuke the remote repository while muttering "I'll fix it in production."

Treating yourself like a software project is peak developer energy. While everyone else is promising to hit the gym, this guy's posting a changelog for himself like he just pushed to production. The real joke is thinking any of those bugs will actually get fixed before next December's emergency hotfix. At least he didn't label it "various performance improvements" which we all know means "I broke something but can't figure out what."

When your coworker casually drops a commit labeled "Small Fixes" that changes 12,566 lines and deletes 10,508 lines. The shock and horror! That's not a small fix—that's reconstructive surgery on the codebase! Future you will be digging through git blame wondering what nuclear explosion happened that day. And good luck with the code review... "LGTM" is about to become "Let God Take Me."

When faced with a tiny 10-line pull request, we're all code review heroes ready to suggest refactoring into separate functions. But show us a 500-line monstrosity and suddenly it's "LGTM" (Looks Good To Me)—the digital equivalent of "I didn't read this but I trust you didn't break production." The cognitive overload is real! Your brain just nopes out after line 47, and honestly, who has time to review someone's entire dissertation on why they needed 12 nested if-statements?

The GitHub contribution graph: where your self-worth as a developer gets reduced to little green squares. We've got "Just a Developer" with their random sprinkles of productivity, "The Weekender" who only codes when normal people are partying, and "The Unrealistic Expectations" who apparently never sleeps, eats, or touches grass. Don't forget "Getting Ready to Search for a New Job" with that sudden burst of activity right before updating the resume. The "GitHub Wizard" trying to look consistently productive, "The Mondrian" creating actual art with their commits, and "The Cupid Shuffle" forming little hearts because... why code efficiently when you can make your contribution graph look pretty? Remember kids, quantity of commits ≠ quality of code. But try telling that to recruiters who think your GitHub activity is a personality test.