Be Very Afraid Of Git

Someone just turned Git into a fandom universe! 😂 This dev brilliantly reimagines version control as fan fiction terminology: repos = "fandoms" - your project's entire universe branches = "AUs" - alternate universes where your code takes different paths commits = "episodes" - each development milestone in your coding saga main = "canon" - the official, accepted storyline of your codebase rebase = "retcon" - retroactively changing history (and causing team drama) merge = "crossover" - when two storylines dramatically come together Next PR meeting: "So we need to crossover this AU with canon after we finish these episodes, but careful not to retcon what the other fandom is doing!"

Behold the future of coding: a three-button keyboard that distills programming to its purest form—Copy, Paste, and a logo that's probably GitHub or StackOverflow. The hardware manufacturers finally figured out what we actually do all day! Why write original code when someone on the internet already solved your problem? The "expert" part is knowing exactly which code to steal and how to make it look like you understood it in your commit messages. Future job interviews: "How efficiently can you Google?"

Nothing quite like that moment of existential dread when you open a pull request with 5,265 additions and 266 deletions across 27 files. Do you start with the easy wins? Skim through hoping it's mostly auto-generated code? Or just approve it and pray to the Git gods that production doesn't catch fire? The only thing certain is that your afternoon is now officially ruined and your coffee isn't nearly strong enough for this nonsense.

Open source maintainers having to explicitly tell contributors not to add malware is like telling a fox not to eat your chickens. That single bullet point in the contribution guide is doing some heavy lifting—as if malicious actors read documentation and go "oh darn, guess I'll have to find another repo to corrupt." The desperate plea of "Please do not add malware" has the same energy as Dora telling Swiper not to swipe. Spoiler alert: Swiper's gonna swipe anyway.

That moment when you're faced with the eternal developer dilemma: spend an entire day making the codebase better or just slap together some hacky solution that'll come back to haunt you in six months. The hand reaching for that "minimum effort hack" button is all of us at 4:55pm on a Friday. Sure, you could refactor everything properly, but then your PR would be 2000 files and nobody wants to review that monstrosity anyway. Technical debt? That's a problem for Future You. And Future You hates Current You for a reason.

The classic trolley problem, but make it git. You've got one innocent developer on the upper track and a whole team on the lower track. What's a responsible engineer to do? Run git rebase master of course! Plot twist: rebasing doesn't actually save anyone. It just rewrites history so that lone developer who was safe on the upper track now gets yeeted to the lower track with everyone else. The team went from "we're all gonna die together" to "we're STILL all gonna die together, but now with a cleaner commit history." The best part? That "Successfully rebased and updated ref" message is basically git's way of saying "I did what you asked, don't blame me for the consequences." Sure, your branch looks linear and beautiful now, but at what cost? At what cost?! Pro tip: This is why some teams have a strict "no rebase on shared branches" policy. Because one person's quest for a pristine git log can turn into everyone's merge conflict nightmare faster than you can say git reflog .