Be Honest

Ah, the classic programmer's dilemma! When you refuse to share your code, it's never about greed—it's because your implementation is held together with duct tape, Stack Overflow snippets, and questionable variable names like temp_fix_delete_later_v3_FINAL . The shame is real when your elegant solution in theory turned into a horrifying Frankenstein's monster in execution. Every programmer knows that feeling when someone asks "Can I see your code?" and your fight-or-flight response kicks in faster than an infinite loop crashes your IDE.

Seventeen days in and this developer has already achieved enlightenment: deleting dead code with zero hesitation. Most engineers spend months tiptoeing around unused functions like they're ancient artifacts that might curse the entire codebase if disturbed. Not this legend. They're out here Marie Kondo-ing the repo on day seventeen, yeeting functions straight to main like they own the place. The energy here is immaculate. No pull request anxiety, no "but what if we need it later?" Just pure, unfiltered confidence in code deletion. Either they're incredibly brave or their onboarding process was chef's kiss . Meanwhile, senior devs are probably sweating bullets wondering if that function was actually load-bearing for some obscure edge case from 2019. Pro tip: Dead code is like that gym membership you never use. It costs nothing to keep around, but deep down you know it's just taking up space and making you feel guilty.

You know that feeling when you're excited about the shiny new project, completely ignoring the one from last week that's barely treading water, while your GitHub is basically an underwater graveyard of abandoned repos? Yeah, that's the developer life cycle in three panels. The real kicker is we all swear "this time will be different" with each new project, but somehow last week's "revolutionary idea" is already drowning in the pool of forgotten commits. Meanwhile, your GitHub profile is a museum of skeletons - each repo a testament to that initial burst of motivation followed by... crickets. The worst part? You'll scroll past those dead projects every time you push to the new one, feel a tiny pang of guilt, and then immediately forget about it. Rinse and repeat until your GitHub looks like a post-apocalyptic wasteland of "TODO: Add README" commits.

The classic "test in production" approach - because who needs staging environments when you've got paying customers as your QA team? Nothing quite matches that adrenaline rush of pushing untested code straight to prod and then watching the Slack channel explode while frantically typing "git revert" with one hand and reaching for coffee with the other. It's like skydiving, except the parachute is made of Stack Overflow answers and desperate prayers.

Oh honey, the absolute BETRAYAL of running git blame on some cursed code only to discover that the culprit is... YOU. From three years ago. On a Friday. Because of COURSE it was a Friday—when your brain was already halfway to happy hour and you were just yeeting code into production like confetti at a parade. The way this developer goes from confident detective to having a full-blown existential crisis is *chef's kiss*. Nothing quite matches the horror of realizing you're not hunting down some incompetent colleague—you're staring into a mirror of your past self's crimes against coding. The ghost of Friday Past has come to haunt you, and it's wearing YOUR face.

The modern developer's ark is a bizarre menagerie of code Frankenstein'd together from various sources. Up top, we've got the majestic AI tools (Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT) and the trusty GitHub repos we "borrow" from, plus those YouTube tutorials we frantically search at 2PM when nothing works. But when the client shows up? Suddenly we're presenting some unholy chimera of code that barely functions but somehow ships. The client's reaction is universal: "What the hell is this?" while we stand there pretending this abomination was our plan all along. The greatest skill in modern development isn't writing code—it's explaining why your code looks like it was written by five different people with conflicting goals... because it was.