Seems Sus

So you're telling me that to "connect" my LinkedIn account, I need to literally hand over my LinkedIn email and password like I'm giving away the keys to my digital kingdom? Nothing says "totally legit and not sketchy at all" like a third-party app asking for your raw credentials instead of using OAuth like every other service that respects your security. The absolute AUDACITY to mark this as "RECOMMENDED" while simultaneously offering a Chrome extension as "TEMPORARY" is sending me. Like, yeah bro, just casually type your password into our form—what could possibly go wrong? LinkedIn's security team is probably having a collective meltdown seeing this UX disaster. OAuth exists for a reason, people! It's 2024, not the Stone Age of web authentication.

HTML quietly nestled among actual programming languages is the digital equivalent of a cat sneaking into bread loaf formation. It's just sitting there, hoping no one notices it doesn't belong in this lineup of compiled and interpreted languages. The cat's smug little face says it all: "Yes, I'm basically just markup, but I snuck into the programming party anyway and nobody can kick me out."

The holy trinity of software development: Stack Overflow for solutions, copy-paste shortcuts for implementation, and the sleep-deprived original authors who actually built the thing from scratch. After 15 years in this industry, I've learned the real heroes aren't the ones answering questions online—they're the caffeine-fueled maniacs who wrote the original codebase at 3am, powered by energy drinks and pure spite. The rest of us are just digital archaeologists digging through their ancient artifacts.

Product managers and UX designers really thought they did something by adding that tutorial button, huh? Meanwhile, 99% of users are smashing "Yeah, Skip!" faster than they can say "I'll figure it out myself" and then immediately flooding Slack with "how do I..." questions. The real kicker? Your team spent three sprints building that gorgeous interactive tutorial with tooltips, animations, and progress tracking. Nobody watches it. Ever. But somehow it's the devs' fault when users can't find the export button that's been in the same spot for two years. We've all been on both sides of this. Skip the tutorial, break something, then complain the documentation sucks. It's the circle of tech life.

Content Shashank Dixit shashark Designer: hey I think I have a very good idea for a design Developer: do you know JS? No CSS ? nO Developer: then I have decided you don't have a good idea

Content Sg ChatGPT No, there is no built-in JavaScript function to fill a string with a character from the left until a certain length. However, you can create your own function which may look something like this: Insert New function leftpad(str, len, char) if (str. length len) return str; var missing len - str. length; for (var i 0; 1 missing; i) str char str; return str; g You padstart? g ChatGPT Yes, the method you are looking for is String.prototype.padStart ( ). It takes in two arguments: Target length - Number of characters in the resulting string. Character to pad with (optional).