The Digital Disaster Artist

The top part shows a bracelet that supposedly "converts stress into electricity." The bottom part shows what happens when programmers wear it—they literally burst into flames from the sheer amount of stress-generated power. If tech companies installed these on their dev teams, they could probably power entire data centers during sprint deadlines. Forget nuclear fusion—we've been sitting on an infinite energy source this whole time: programmer anxiety during production deploys.

The evolution of software development methodologies visualized with perfect accuracy: Waterfall: You meticulously build each component one by one, in strict sequence, until you finally have a car. No going back to fix the wheels once you've moved on to the chassis! Agile: Start with a skateboard, then a scooter, then a bike, then a quad bike, and finally a car. Each iteration is a functional product that gets you from A to B with increasing sophistication. AI: Just throw in a weird green alien car from The Jetsons at the beginning, and somehow it magically transforms into the same car as the other methodologies. Nobody knows how it works internally, but hey, it got there faster!

Ah yes, the classic Linux evangelism. "Just use Linux" they say, as if it's one simple thing to install. Meanwhile, what they don't tell you is that "Linux" is actually this comically overwhelming family tree of distributions that would make genealogists have a panic attack. That image shows the absurd branching evolution of every Linux distro ever created. Ubuntu, Debian, Arch, Fedora, Gentoo, and about 500 others I've never heard of despite using Linux for 15 years. It's like walking into an ice cream shop and instead of just chocolate or vanilla, there are 600 flavors and the guy behind the counter is judging you for not knowing the difference between Mint Cinnamon and Mint MATE.

The first comment: "When I do git blame, it's not about finding the person who did the mistake. I want to find out when the code was added, which task it was related to, and if I need more details, the person who wrote the code." The reply: "I use git blame just to make sure it wasn't me before I go on a tirade..." Ah yes, the two types of developers. The professional who uses tools for their intended purpose, and the rest of us who just want plausible deniability before ranting in Slack. Nothing quite like that moment of relief when you discover someone else wrote that abomination, followed by the crushing realization it was actually you from three years ago.

Starting them young with kernel compilation and chmod permissions. That baby's first words won't be "mama" but "sudo apt-get install". The look of existential dread on the infant's face says it all - forced into the cult of Tux before even learning to crawl. In 18 years, that kid will either be maintaining the Linux kernel or in therapy explaining how they were compiling Gentoo before potty training.

When your entire career revolves around version control but you can't control your dad jokes. The classic naming convention gone wrong—kid's not a branch you can just merge later! Somewhere in the world, there's a developer named "Commit" whose dad thought he was being clever. The real tragedy? That kid probably grew up to use Mercurial instead.