What Was That

The four stages of debugging grief in one Discord chat: Confidence: "yea" - I got this! Panic: "WHY DOES MY CODE BREAK I DIDNT DO ANYTHING" - the universal cry of developers everywhere who swear they only changed one tiny thing Realization: "oh" - that moment when you spot your missing semicolon or extra bracket Surrender: "nvm" - the programming equivalent of "let's pretend this never happened" The beauty is in how quickly we cycle through these emotions. One minute you're screaming into the void, the next you're quietly closing your IDE tab hoping nobody noticed your catastrophic typo.

Content THERE IS NO BUG IN MY CODE, IM A NOCODE DEV

Content When you write a few lines of code and get hit with 40 errors even though all you've done is declare an INT What What the fuck

The horror movie villain's greatest weakness: corporate IT processes! Even knife-wielding maniacs can't bypass the sacred ticket system. The programmer's terrified face in panel 2 perfectly captures that moment when you realize someone's about to ask you for help via direct message instead of following protocol. And that final panel? Pure developer schadenfreude - watching the villain collapse at the mere mention of "submit a ticket" is basically what happens to any dev's soul when forced to deal with JIRA for the 47th time today. The ultimate developer defense system isn't a firewall - it's bureaucracy.

Content 3 Building the image using docker run build . --networkhost fixed the issue for me. The error I was getting was caused by Docker not being able to access the Internet, so spoonfeeding it "hey, just use host" seems to have fixed the problem. Share Follow answered Jan 27 at 18:35 walnut salami 2,790 0 1 11 33 3 It's ... kind of surreal googling an error, opening a stackoverflow answer and finding out that both the question and the answer are mine but several months later - walnutsalami May 24 at 9:24

The circle of digital life! Your AI coding assistant confidently suggests improvements while secretly running on a diet of Stack Overflow answers from 2014. Meanwhile, those Stack Overflow answers need constant human updates because technology evolves faster than documentation. It's the ultimate ouroboros - AI pretending to be smarter than the humans who created the very content it regurgitates. Next time your AI suggests "optimizing" your perfectly functional code, remember it's just parroting some poor soul who got 47 upvotes seven years ago.