Quack Overflow

The four most terrifying words in software development: "Yesterday it worked." That magical moment when your code decides to spontaneously self-destruct despite zero changes. The digital equivalent of your car making that weird noise only when the mechanic isn't around. Somewhere in your codebase, a cosmic bit has flipped, a cache got corrupted, or—let's be honest—a gremlin moved in and started rearranging your memory addresses for fun. Time to dust off the debugger and prepare for that special kind of existential crisis where you question reality itself.

SWEET MOTHER OF UNDEFINED VARIABLES! Is that a cake labeled "NaN"?! The HORROR! When your dessert encounters the same existential crisis as your JavaScript code! That cake isn't just not a number—it's a full-blown identity crisis wrapped in white chocolate! Somewhere, a programmer is having heart palpitations looking at this bakery display. The cake exists and doesn't exist simultaneously—it's Schrödinger's Dessert! And you thought debugging was hard? Try eating something that JavaScript doesn't even recognize as a valid quantity! Bon appétit...if you can figure out how many slices that is!

Content Me when I'm coding Me when I'm bugfixing what I just coded

The eternal struggle of every developer - trying to remember how to get the damn array length in whatever language you're using. Is it array.size() ? Or array.len() ? Maybe array.length() ? Or just len(array) ? Your brain goes into full mathematical meltdown trying to remember the correct syntax while Stack Overflow is down. Meanwhile, Python folks are smugly typing len(array) while Java developers are muscle-memorizing array.length (no parentheses, because why make it consistent?). And don't get me started on JavaScript with both array.length and string.length() . The true programming interview question should just be "how do you check array length in 5 different languages" - separates the real ones from the Google-dependent coders.

The eternal struggle of a desperate coder, captured in one image! On the left, we have LLMs promising to "help with programming questions" but won't actually insult you (how considerate). On the right, StackOverflow boasting it's "accurate" and "used by people who know what they're doing" while flexing knowledge of "even the most obscure languages." It's the perfect illustration of our coding dilemma: get polite, possibly hallucinated answers from an AI that treats you like a fragile child, or brave StackOverflow where your "simple question" will be closed as duplicate, marked as trivial, and someone will suggest you shouldn't be programming at all. Choose your poison!

Content coo vim ft putchar.c coo norminette ftputchar.c ft putchar.c: Error! Error: NO SPC BF OPR Error: SPC AFTER OPERATOR COO I (line: (line: 17, col: 17, col: 14): 14): extra space before operator missing space after operator Line 17, col 14 extra space Line 17, col 14: missing space Me, just trying to make my first C program