Me, debugging

Content rprogramming uThe Grandmother 9h 9.1 183 Every single google service is currently out, including their cloud console. Let's take a moment to feel the pain of their devops team 4 4.0k J 446 google.com 1, Share Award SINGLE COMMENT THREAD VIEW ALL lazic 9h 9 Awards Did they try to fix them by inverting a binary tree? ) Reply 1.9k ProdrammerHumor.io

Content Wanna be a programmer?? Muhammad Hasan Khan 1st Software Engineer - Opinions are my own 31 I fixed a bug today and after feeling satisfied with my accomplishment for the day, I decided to leave a bit early. As I was driving home, my brain started reviewing my code and found a mistake. I came home and fixed the mistake. And now that I'm about to go to bed, I just realized that there is a better way to fix the bug so I should just discard my earlier change and start over. Do you want to be a programmer? CEO 1,019 66 comments 22 shares

Content Introducing Shitify. A Reverse Linter. Add errors to your code. Shitify is a new tool that's shaking up the world of software development. It's a reverse linter, which means it adds errors to your code. It's simple to use. Just install it with pm: pm install -g shitify shitify myCode.js Now your code is full of errors! This might sound like a bad thing, but it's actually a great way to test your code. If your code can handle errors, then it's probably robust enough to handle anything. Additionally, Shitify can make you rich when coding smart contracts because - if the opposite of Biggie's maxim "Mo money mo problems" is true - more problems in your blockchain means more money. Disregard bitches, acquire currency! ProdrammerHumor.io

Content The uS A romantic, candlelit dinner would be incomplete without An email about a critical production bug

Ah, the digital clock showing 9:77:58 – the perfect representation of what happens when you decide requirements are just "suggestions." This is basically what your code looks like when you decide that time constraints, logic, and basic physics are merely optional guidelines. Sure, there are only 60 minutes in an hour according to "conventional standards," but your code boldly asks: "Says who?" This is the same energy as returning a string when the function clearly asks for an integer. Revolutionary? Perhaps. Functional? Absolutely not. But hey, at least your code is consistent in its complete disregard for reality!

Corporate logic at its finest! Why use battle-tested, free open source solutions when you can burn six months reinventing the wheel with extra bugs? Nothing says "enterprise quality" like rejecting perfectly good code because it wasn't invented here. The best part? When it inevitably fails, they'll hire consultants to implement the open source solution they rejected in the first place. Bonus points if they call it a "proprietary custom solution" in the shareholder meeting! 💸