It Works On My Machine Isn't Enough

Content foone Foone 15 Std. So I learned of an amusing bug today: Docker for Windows won't run if you have the Razer Synapse driver management tool running. But the reason is the funny part... 142 17 5.638 ( 11.143 1 foone Foone 15 Std. So, both programs want to ensure you only run one copy of themselves. So they create a global mutex using the GUID of their NET assembly, right? 17 36 ( 834 foone Foone 15 Std. except! they do it wrong. And they both do it wrong in the same way. The code involved is something like this: string.Format("Global fO" (object) Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly0.GetType0.GUID); 11 17 44 M 888 1 foone Foone 15 Std. The idea is to get the GUID of the assembly that's executing and to create a GUID based on that, so now you can only run one copy of it. 2 17 20 M 650 1 foone Foone 15 Std. But it's wrong The GetTvpe0 part isn't supposed to be there. That gets the type of the assembly, not the assembly itself. And that type is System.Reflection.RuntimeAssembly, part of NET itself. 0 2 17 29 1.005 foone Foone 15 Std. So what happens is that both of them are creating a global mutex to ensure only one copy runs, but instead of basing the GUID on their own code, they're both using the GUID of a part of NET itself. And thev're using the same one! O 4 17 45 ( 1.168 foone Foone . 15 Std. So how'd that happen? Well, it turns out we can tell EXACTLY how that happened. Because the answer is... STACK OVERFLOW 16 17 301 3.003 1. foone Foone . 15 Std. Back in 2009, the user "Nathan" asked how to get the GUID of the running accomblu Twitter durchsuchen foone Foone 15 Std. A year and a month later, it was pointed out (by "Yoopergeek") that it gives the wrong GUID. Three vears later, Cerebrus returns and fixes the answer. They can't delete it, because it was accented 17 30 1252 1 foone Foone 15 Std. But because they made an error in replying to someone in 2009. this flawed code caused bugs that still exist as recently as March of 2018. Docker for Windows won't start if Razer Synapse 3 is ... Just a quick tip if vou're struggling to get docker for Windows working on Windows 10. If vou have Razer reddit.com g 17 112 M 1829 1. foone Foone That flawed stackoverflow post is here: How do I programmaticallv get the GUID of an application in .... I need to access the assemblv of mv proiect in C NET2.0. I can see the GUID in the 'Assembly Information' dialog in under stackoverflow.com 6:48 vorm. 18. Feb. 2020 Twitter Web App 39 Retweets 1.281 Gefllt mir"-Andaben

Remember the first rule of memory safety is to have fun! Ah yes, nothing says "fun" like a malloc() function that completely ignores your size parameter and just returns a random memory address. Because who needs memory management when you can have chaos ? This is basically the programming equivalent of asking for a specific room in a hotel and the receptionist blindfolding themselves, spinning around, and throwing your key card somewhere in the general vicinity of the building. Your program isn't crashing, it's just playing an exciting game of "where the heck is my data?" every time you run it. Memory corruption roulette - the game where everyone loses, especially your users!

You're innocently working on line 6061, making some small change to a function, when suddenly you need to jump to the implementation. Your IDE dutifully takes you there... and you land on line 19515. That sinking feeling in your stomach? That's the realization that you're now deep in a 13,000+ line file that someone (probably you six months ago) promised to refactor "later." Nothing says "technical debt" quite like a single file that could double as a novella. At this point, you're not even mad—just impressed that your IDE hasn't crashed yet. Time to add another TODO comment and pretend you didn't see it.

Ah yes, the tea bag floating on top instead of steeping properly—exactly how features work without documentation. Developer thinks it's "common sense" that you're supposed to remove the staple and dunk the bag. User just plops the whole thing in and wonders why their experience tastes like disappointment and metal. Six months later, the same developer will stare at their own code wondering what dark magic they were attempting.

Ah, the classic interrogation scene but with a coding twist. The detective isn't asking about a murder—he's confronting the suspect about that mythical "future refactoring" everyone promises but never delivers. You know the drill: "I'll clean up this horrific spaghetti code later" becomes a cold case faster than you can say "technical debt." That poor developer in the hospital gown is all of us when our past coding sins finally catch up and the system crashes in production. The only difference between this interrogation and real life is that in real life, we're both the detective AND the suspect. Trust me, your "I'll fix it next sprint" promises are fooling nobody—especially not your future self.

You know QA is absolutely crushing it when they're getting bonuses for ticket volume, but you're staring at gems like "Button doesn't work when I close my eyes" and "Website loads too happy, needs more corporate sadness." Sure, they found 47 bugs this sprint, but 32 of them are just different ways to say "I don't like the color blue." The real challenge isn't fixing the bugs—it's diplomatically explaining that "the login button should sing to me" isn't actually a defect without starting an interdepartmental incident.