I Already Know That Making Code Prettier Is A Mistake

Content GOD, WHY IS QUANTUM MECHANICS SO WEIRD? IN ORDER TO MAKE A RAINBOW, YOU HAVE TO 'BREAK" LIGHT INTO WAVELENGTHS WHEN IT ENCOUNTERS A NEW MEDIUM. AFTER THE FLOOD I WANTED TO MAKE A RAINBOW FOR HIM IT'S NOAH'S FAULT. WELL, IT TURNS OUT THAT IF YOU WANT THAT YOU HAVE TO TWIDDLE WITH A BUNCH OF ASPECTS OF THE UNIVERSE, ADDING WEIRD STUFF LIKE PHOTON SUPERPOSITION AND PROBABILITY AMPLITUDES. BUT, EVERY TIME I FIXED ONE THING, SOMETHING ELSE SEEMED TO BREAK. SO. I KEPT CHANGING THINGS AND CHANGING THINGS AND THE SYSTEM GOT MORE AND MORE HACKY AS TIME WENT ON. FINALLY, IT GOT SO THAT EXPLAINS ALL FUNDAMENTALLY UGLY, OF PHYSICS AND I ADDED UNCERTAINTY WHAT VOU SAID TO SO NOBODY COULDI NOAH AFTER THE LOOK TOO CLOSE FLOOD. EXACTLY. 4.000 YEARS EARLIER NEVER AGAIN. smbc-comics.com ProarammerHumor.io

The eternal battle between humans and printers continues! On the left, a 3D printer confidently accepts the challenge of printing a human head with some random yellow filament. Meanwhile, the office printer on the right has a complete meltdown when asked to print basic black and white text, screaming about missing yellow ink. Nothing says "technological progress" quite like a $2000 machine that refuses to print your tax forms because it's out of a color you never use. The irony that complex 3D printing seems more reliable than 2D printing is the kind of technological regression that keeps IT people drinking heavily.

Oh god, some frontend developer just had a stroke and created this monstrosity! Instead of a simple dropdown, they've split month names into three columns of syllables you have to piece together like a deranged puzzle. Want to select March? That's "m" + "a" + "rch". September? "sept" + "em" + "ber". And don't get me started on that default date - January 0, 1900. Perfect for when you need to book a time machine to visit the epoch time's slightly older brother. This is what happens when you ask for "innovative UI design" in a sprint planning meeting and someone takes it way too literally.

Content Noooo, that's what debuggers are for!! 34 34 Debug using print) Debug using print) 14 14 0.1 10score 55 imgRip.com 2 70 85 100 115 130 2 0.1 145

The eternal struggle between documentation readers and documentation avoiders! While one developer is frantically Googling, checking Stack Overflow, and reverse-engineering libraries, the other calmly points to the documentation that literally spells out the solution. It's the perfect encapsulation of two developer archetypes: the one who treats documentation as a last resort and the one who's discovered the ancient secret that documentation... actually contains useful information. Revolutionary concept! The final panel's deadpan "It's docs" is basically the programmer equivalent of "have you tried turning it off and on again?" - simple, obvious, yet somehow mind-blowing to those who never considered it.

Content ATRADE OFFERA i receive: Compile time optimizations you receive: Absolutely unreadable compiler errors C templates