Sql Cerificates

Content me pressing the up arrow key 100 times instead of rewriting the SQL query

Content Ragecommie 4h Americans: while(true) eatO; Reply 4 210 TatakaRuhito 3h no the code that discribes their food consumption is just: Error Overload 4 57 Ragecommie 3h 4 Awards I believe you mean... SNACK OVERFLOW 4 116 J ProarammerHumor.io

Content My SQL query turns one month old today after running for 720 hours 0111111152.7 3111111152.5 6111111144.0 911111151.3 11111149.3 4C11111154.9 7C11 43.6 10111111152.9 2111111 46.5 5 64.7 8 55.6 11111 18.7 111153.0G62. 7G SwpI 111.151.39T PID USER PRI NI VIRT RES SHR S CPU MEM TIME Command 3921466 postgres, 30 10 1710G 7464M 2316 R 95.0 11.6 681h postgres: F1Help F2Setup F3SearchF4FilterF5Tree F6SortByF7Nice -F8Nice F9Kill F1 NAME TYPE SIZE USED PRIO devsda3 partition 321.4G 321.4G -2 swapfile file 400G 400G -3 swapfile2 file 300G 298.4G -4 swapfile3 file 400G 162.1G -5 I hope I don't have to buy another ssd to add as swap because I don't have any more drive space to save it from the OOM killer if it continues to grow. ProarammerHumor.io

Oh. My. GOD. The absolute AUDACITY of developers creating fake test data that's so outrageously unrealistic! 🙄 You know you've reached peak developer desperation when you're creating fictional 150-year-old users just to avoid those pesky validation errors! Heaven forbid we use NORMAL birth dates like June 1, 1970! No no no, we need someone born during the CIVIL WAR because that's TOTALLY inconspicuous in our database! The silent agreement among developers to create these ancient test users is the industry's darkest secret. It's like we're all running underground retirement homes for digital vampires born in 1873. DRAMATIC GASP!

The career progression of a CS grad who never quite made it. Algorithms? Blank stare. Database systems? Dead inside. But show them a joke about semicolons and suddenly they're a technical genius. It's the programming equivalent of only understanding sports through memes about referees being blind.

Somewhere in the multiverse, SQL decided that letting you accidentally nuke your entire database was just too entertaining to prevent. That's why UPDATE and DELETE statements don't require a WHERE clause—they just strongly suggest it. It's like SQL is that friend who hands you a chainsaw and says "try not to cut your leg off" instead of giving you safety training. The number of junior devs who've learned this lesson by wiping production data is probably higher than the number of semicolons in their codebase. And yet, decades later, we're still teaching this lesson on classroom projectors instead of fixing the language. Classic tech industry solution: "Let's document the problem instead of solving it!"