SQL Injection In Real Life

SQL developer: "I'll just ask for users between 25-30 years old. Simple query, right?" MongoDB: "Hold my document-oriented beer while I throw this nested JSON monstrosity at you with operators like $and, $gte, and $lte that look like someone's trying to launder money through code." The mental journey from SELECT * FROM users WHERE age BETWEEN 25 AND 30 to whatever that bracket nightmare is... pure existential crisis material. The facial expressions say it all - from innocent curiosity to complete spiritual awakening.

Oh no, the classic "junior dev learns about security the hard way" moment! Nothing says "career-limiting move" quite like accidentally pasting database credentials into ChatGPT while asking for MongoDB help. That innocent "hehe" quickly turns to "not hehe" when you realize you've just handed over root access with the world's most predictable password (hunter2) to an AI that remembers everything . Security team's gonna love this one... right after they finish having simultaneous heart attacks.

Content R Roy The Idiot 7 months ago Recently, a file was discovered in TF2 called "coconut jpg" which is a jpg of a coconut, a comment as follows "I have no fucking idea who put this here, but when I deleted it, the game wouldn't start. Words cannot describe my fucking confusion" That can't be a good sign. S 508 97 E 15

Looks like someone forgot to handle their price exceptions in production. That electronic shelf label is just screaming "null null" where a price should be - the digital equivalent of a store clerk throwing their hands up and saying "I have no freaking idea what this costs anymore." Even the database is feeling the economic crisis. Can't afford to store actual values these days, just pointers to nothing. Somewhere a backend developer is getting a frantic call while pretending they didn't see the Slack notification.

Content Google ora-02270: no matching unique or primary key for this column-list Remove ora-00001: unique constraint (sysc001690543) violated ora-06512: at Remove "sys.dbmssql", line 1721 sal create date ora-01861: literal does not match format string ora-06512: at Remove Remove "sys.dbmssql", line 1721 sql insert date sql date Remove Remove Google Search I'm Feeling Lucky

Content Ijust wanted to add to this discussion that I am just compiling on VS and GCC, and used to use include guards. I have now switched to pragma once, and the only reason for me is not 199 performance or portability or standard as I don't really care what is standard as long as VS and GCC support it, and that is that: pragma once reduces possibilities for bugs. It is all too easy to copy and paste a header file to another header file, modify it to suit ones needs, and forget to change the name of the include guard. Once both are included, it takes you a while to track down the error, as the error messages arent necessarily clear. Share Follow edited Nov 30, 2014 at 9:57 answered Jul 22, 2011 at 16:55 Cookie 11.7k 13 52 81 5 This is the correct reason. Forget performance--we should use pragma once because it's less error prone. It occurs to me that if compilers are already tracking include guards, they're already doing most of the work necessary to issue warnings when they see different files using the same macro name. - rieux Jun 13, 2019 at 6:36 Add a comment pragma once has unfixable bugs. It should never be used. 169 If your include search path is sufficiently complicated, the compiler may be unable to tell the difference between two headers with the same basename (e.g. afoo.h and bfoo.h), so a pragma once in one of them will suppress both. It may also be unable to tell that two different relative includes (e.g. include "foo.h" and include "..afoo.h" refer to the same file, so pragma once will fail to suppress a redundant include when it should have. lanc arca attocic tho commorc amia