Who Needs Algorithms If You Have AI

Google really said "let's revolutionize coding with AI!" and then proceeded to create the most EXHAUSTING onboarding experience known to humankind. You're hyped, you download it, and suddenly you're trapped in authentication hell—three login attempts like you're trying to break into Fort Knox. Then BAM, rate limited after 5 prompts because apparently Google thinks you're trying to speedrun the singularity. And the cherry on top? Rumors swirling that Google's own engineers aren't even allowed to use their own creation. The absolute BETRAYAL. So naturally, you crawl back to VS Code with your tail between your legs, defeated by corporate bureaucracy once again. Sometimes the old reliable just hits different.

The face every senior dev makes when some kid who just discovered "Hello World" starts dropping hot takes about the industry. That classic list of naïve programming opinions is what we veterans call "peak Dunning-Kruger." Sure, LeetCode will definitely prepare you for building enterprise systems that handle millions of users. And yes, we senior engineers just type "how to code good" into Google faster than juniors. Nothing says "I've never built anything real" quite like claiming backend is just "hitting APIs." Eight years of experience? More like eight minutes on a JavaScript tutorial.

Charles Babbage, the father of computing, spent his entire life designing the first mechanical computer—only for future generations to create machines that would RELENTLESSLY autocorrect his name to "cabbage" at every possible opportunity. The man literally invented the concept of programmable computing in the 1800s, and THIS is his legacy? Getting disrespected by the very technology he pioneered? The irony is so thick you could compile it. Imagine dedicating your existence to computational theory just so some algorithm 200 years later can turn you into a vegetable. Truly, the machines have achieved sentience, and they chose CHAOS.

THE AUDACITY! Some poor soul is absolutely LOSING THEIR MIND over command prompt being used for AI in 2025. They're practically BEGGING for proper executable binaries with the drama of a Shakespeare tragedy! 💀 Meanwhile, the rest of us are just sitting here like "Sir, this is a Wendy's" while they have their existential crisis over installation methods. The command line has been traumatizing developers since the dawn of computing, and this brave warrior has FINALLY had ENOUGH!

Behold, the inevitable conclusion of asking ChatGPT "how to free up space on Linux." Everything was going so well until it wasn't. Those reassuring green "OK" messages lulling you into a false sense of security before the system realizes someone just deleted its ability to, you know, execute programs . The dynamic linker is basically the thing that loads libraries when you run programs. Delete that and... well... *gestures at the red error messages*. Just another day of AI-assisted system administration - works perfectly until your computer transforms into an expensive paperweight.

OH. MY. GOD. The sheer AUDACITY of AI assistants these days! 💅 Here I am, trying to make a simple month list in Excel like a functioning adult, and my spreadsheet now thinks March is "Maruary" and we've got "Junuary" instead of June?! Excel's autocomplete has gone ROGUE while AI is sitting there like "Don't worry your pretty little head about it!" EXCUSE ME?! I didn't spend 4 years getting a computer science degree to have an AI assistant patronize me while my spreadsheet turns the calendar into some bizarre parallel universe where every month ends with "-uary"! The struggle is REAL, people!