When ChatGPT Is Your Entire Tech Stack

The classic AI hallucination in its natural habitat! Someone asked ChatGPT to review their 15-19k line trading algorithm, and instead of saying "that's too much code for me to process," it went full project manager mode with the classic "I'll get back to you in 48-72 hours" response. The desperate "(help)" at the end perfectly captures that moment when you realize your AI assistant thinks it's a human contractor who needs a weekend to review your code. Bonus points for the "Gone Wild" tag – because nothing says wild like an LLM pretending it needs sleep and work-life balance!

The iceberg of AI terror is real, folks! On the surface, it's just "AI" - those fancy chatbots everyone's talking about. Dive a bit deeper and you hit "Machine Learning" where your code starts making decisions without you explicitly telling it how. But the true horror? That murky "Deep Learning" zone where neural networks do their black magic. And what's holding this entire technological monstrosity together? Some poor developer's spaghetti Python code and linear algebra that they barely remember from college. The whole industry is basically running on StackOverflow answers and caffeine. Next time someone says they "work in AI," remember they're just the tip of an iceberg floating on a sea of mathematical duct tape and prayer.

2015: A fellowship of skilled developers gathering around the table, sharing knowledge, debating solutions, and crafting code together with their combined wisdom. 2025: Just Gandalf sitting alone in a green-screened room, typing prompts into ChatGPT while his entire dev team has been replaced by a subscription to the AI Pro tier. The budget for the Christmas party is much smaller now, but hey, at least the AI doesn't argue about tabs vs spaces.

So Microsoft wants to eliminate C and C++ by 2030 using AI to rewrite their entire codebase. Because nothing says "brilliant strategy" like letting algorithms rewrite millions of lines of battle-tested code that's been running critical systems for decades. The hubris is *chef's kiss*. They're so busy flexing their AI muscles that they forgot to ask the most important question: just because you CAN automate the rewriting of foundational infrastructure doesn't mean you SHOULD. What could possibly go wrong with AI touching code that powers Windows, Office, and Azure? It's not like memory safety bugs are subtle or anything. The Jeff Goldblum meme from Jurassic Park is the perfect response here. They were so preoccupied with whether they could use AI to eliminate C/C++, they didn't stop to think if they should. Because replacing decades of institutional knowledge and battle-hardened code with AI-generated Rust (presumably) is definitely going to go smoothly. No edge cases, no undefined behavior gotchas, just pure algorithmic magic. Sure.

Content Everyone cares about User Experience but nobody cares about Developer Experience aG

Ah, the classic "I'll just install this cool new tool" saga that ends with your entire workflow in shambles. Cursor (an AI coding assistant) decided it wasn't content being just another app—it wanted to be THE app by hijacking the sacred 'code' command. This is why we can't have nice things in tech. Some product manager somewhere thought, "You know what developers would love? If we silently changed their muscle memory commands without asking!" Ten years of typing the same command, and suddenly you're launching the wrong app because some DevEx team decided their tool deserves keyboard shortcut supremacy. The real kicker is the "No prompt. No warning. Just broken flow." That's developer tool installation in its purest form—surprise chaos with a side of productivity loss. Always read the install scripts, kids. DevEx might be in the details, but so is the devil.