Two Rs In Strawberry

Content when you can't remember if you're supposed to change the project-level urls.py or the app-level urls.py AH, IT'S FIFTY -FIFTY.

The classic tech startup founder transformation arc, but make it AI. You start with that ambitious gleam in your eye thinking you're about to revolutionize machine learning. Then you dump your entire Series A funding into GPUs and cloud infrastructure because "we need compute power!" Next thing you know, you've automated every single position in your company including your own, because efficiency, right? The punchline? Your AI-powered product is so expensive to run that your target market can't even afford the subscription fees. Turns out training models on petabytes of data and running inference at scale costs slightly more than a Netflix subscription. Who knew that burning through millions in compute costs would make your pricing model look like a luxury yacht rental? The clown makeup progression perfectly captures the descent from "visionary entrepreneur" to "why is my AWS bill six figures this month?" The real kicker is realizing you've essentially built a very expensive solution looking for a problem that can actually pay for it.

The classic "change my mind" format gets an AI twist. Guy's sitting there with his coffee, confidently declaring AI won't steal jobs—but with that crucial asterisk that people who actually know how to integrate it will be the ones doing the stealing. Meanwhile, there's literally an "Eden AI" paper on his table and a robot lurking in the background. The irony is thicker than legacy code comments. It's the perfect representation of the current tech landscape: those panicking about AI replacing developers versus those quietly building automation tools that make three developers do the work of thirty.

The ultimate AI reverse uno card. Someone asks ChatGPT if it can write code without copying from others, and ChatGPT fires back with "No, can you?" Brutal existential burn considering literally none of us write code from scratch anymore. We're all just professional Stack Overflow archaeologists with fancy job titles. The irony is delicious—humans accusing AI of plagiarism while we're all just remixing snippets and libraries that someone else built. At least the AI is honest about it.

OMFG, the absolute AUDACITY of this code! 😱 Someone's gone and created the most SCANDALOUS piece of programming known to mankind - a file that's half "secret" and half "public GitHub" with nothing but pure, unadulterated NONSENSE! This masterpiece of chaos defines fruits as data types, throws in random words like "Spoon" and "Frozen", and then proceeds to create the most grammatically offensive function in history that looks like someone had a seizure on their keyboard while thinking about fruit salad. The punchline? Training AI on THIS would be like teaching a toddler English by reading them the ingredients list on a shampoo bottle... BACKWARDS... WHILE SCREAMING! 💀

You're trying to move a feature you barely understand into production, and your support system is basically a human pyramid of questionable reliability. Your senior is at the bottom (probably on their phone), Claude and Gemini are doing the heavy lifting in the middle, your cursor is there for moral support, and somehow a 12-year-old StackOverflow thread is the one actually keeping everything from collapsing. The best part? You're at the top pretending you know what you're doing while everyone below is desperately trying to keep you from falling. Modern development in a nutshell: standing on the shoulders of AI assistants, outdated forum posts, and one senior dev who's probably questioning their life choices. At least nobody's reading the documentation—that would be too easy.