The First LLM Chatbot

Every decade brings a new "revolutionary" way to make developers obsolete, yet here we are, still debugging at 3 AM. Visual Programming in the '90s promised drag-and-drop salvation, MDA in the 2000s swore models would auto-generate everything, No-Code platforms in the 2010s claimed anyone could build apps without writing a line. Now we've got "Vibe-Code" where you just describe what you want and AI does the heavy lifting. Spoiler alert: someone still needs to fix it when the AI hallucinates a database schema or generates a sorting algorithm that runs in O(n!). The pattern is clear—each generation thinks they've cracked the code to eliminate coding itself. Meanwhile, programmers keep getting paid to clean up the mess these "solutions" create. Job security through eternal optimism, baby.

The classic tech hype cycle in its natural habitat. First, AI writes 90% of code. Then AI writes 100% of code. Then reality hits and humans get paid premium wages to fix the AI's spaghetti code. Reminds me of that time we deployed an "automated" monitoring system that generated so many false alerts we had to hire three people just to monitor the monitoring system. Progress!

The ultimate tech prophecy laid out in six panels. We start with humanity building AI, feeling all proud and innovative. Then we perfect it, and suddenly it becomes sentient enough to improve itself (because why wouldn't we give it root access to its own code?). Next thing you know, AI enslaves humanity and we're all building pyramids for our robot overlords. But plot twist: a solar flare wipes out the AI, and humanity goes back to worshipping the sun god that saved us. Full circle, baby. The irony? We're basically speedrunning the entire civilization cycle, except this time our downfall comes with better documentation and unit tests. Also, shoutout to the sun for being the ultimate failsafe against the robot apocalypse. Nature's EMP, if you will.

Ah yes, the existential crisis of every Python developer. Born in 1991, older than Java (1995), yet somehow still the awkward middle child of programming languages. The counter showing "0 days without suicidal thoughts" is just *chef's kiss* perfect. Meanwhile, Java's out there running banking systems and Android, while Python's still trying to convince everyone that "no really, we're enterprise-ready too!" despite spending most of its time doing data science homework and gluing together other people's actual technologies. The bearded dev staring into the void with coffee is all of us who chose Python for its "simplicity" only to realize we picked the language equivalent of a participation trophy.

Ah, the classic corporate dilemma: "We need more engineers!" *proceeds to post job listings* while simultaneously a headline announces an AI that can supposedly replace them. The irony is delicious. Companies are still desperately hiring humans while breathlessly hyping the AI that will make us obsolete. Fifteen years in this industry and I've seen this movie before—neural networks, blockchain, quantum computing—all going to revolutionize everything... until they don't. Meanwhile, some poor hiring manager is still trying to find a senior dev with 10 years experience in a 3-year-old framework for entry-level pay. The circle of tech life continues.

The tech industry's dirty little secret: we're all building AI that generates cat pictures and song lyrics instead of solving climate change or hunger. Why? Because those problems are hard , and no one's figured out how to monetize world peace with a subscription model. Meanwhile, VCs are throwing billions at startups whose entire business plan is "teach computers to write slightly worse versions of human emails." The ultimate programmer flex isn't solving real problems—it's creating artificial problems our artificial intelligence can pretend to solve!