Do Not Disturb Machine Is Learning

Three generations, same circus. New devs think ChatGPT is revolutionary. Old school devs know StackOverflow is the real MVP. Ancient devs? They actually read the documentation—which honestly makes them the most unhinged of the bunch. We've gone from "RTFM" to "copy from SO" to "ask the robot overlord," but the core skill remains unchanged: ctrl+c, ctrl+v, pray it works. The source changes, the desperation doesn't. Fun fact: developers who claim they read documentation are either lying or writing it themselves. There is no third option.

First tweet: "Look at me! I built a SaaS with AI and zero coding! People actually pay for this!" Two days later: "Help! I'm being hacked! My API keys are maxed out, people are bypassing subscriptions, and my database is a dumpster fire!" The classic "I'm not technical" + "I skipped all security measures" combo strikes again. Turns out that building a product without understanding the fundamentals is like building a house with popsicle sticks—impressive until the first strong wind. Friendly reminder: AI can write your code, but it can't protect you from your own hubris. Security isn't just a vibe killer—it's actually kind of important.

Breaking news: Water is wet! That groundbreaking research revealing 84% of software developers use AI for... *checks notes*... software development. Next up: shocking study finds that 99% of chefs use kitchens to cook food. The circular logic is so perfect you could use it as a replacement for π in your calculations. This is the kind of "insight" that justifies someone's entire market research budget while telling us absolutely nothing we didn't already know.

Ah, the classic LinkedIn clickbait switcheroo! Someone's proudly announcing their addiction to the "PORN stack" - which turns out to be P ostgreSQL, O penAI, R eact, and N ext.js. The perfect tech stack for your resume and guaranteed heart attacks for HR departments everywhere. Bonus points for the 703 reactions from developers who nearly spat out their coffee before realizing it's just another tech acronym. Job recruiters must be having a field day with their keyword searches!

Oh look, another tech prophet declaring our imminent obsolescence! The suggestion that we'll blindly trust AI-generated code like Claude without review is getting the Doge Bonk™ it deserves. Twenty years in this industry and I've survived every "this will replace programmers" prediction since Visual Basic. Sure, AI will change things, but the day we stop checking AI output is the day production servers spontaneously combust worldwide. Trust but verify isn't just for nuclear disarmament—it's for that sketchy code your AI buddy wrote while hallucinating documentation that doesn't exist.

OH MY GODDD! This is LITERALLY k-means clustering in its purest form! Those poor souls are manually separating colored balls into distinct clusters like some twisted data science ritual! The algorithm in real life is just as chaotic - throwing random centroids around and then frantically shuffling points between groups until everything looks "good enough." The absolute DRAMA of unsupervised learning, where you're just desperately hoping your arbitrary number of clusters makes sense! And don't even get me started on how this perfectly captures the "elbow method" failing spectacularly when you realize you picked the wrong k value and now your entire analysis is a technicolor disaster!