AI Can't Count To Ten

The eternal tech industry promise: "AGI is just around the corner! Just need another $20 trillion and we're golden!" Meanwhile, the same AI still can't figure out if there's a bicycle in a CAPTCHA. Silicon Valley VCs keep throwing money into the void like it's a competitive sport, convinced that if they burn enough cash, sentient machines will rise from the ashes. Spoiler alert: your neural network is basically just spicy autocomplete with better PR.

Remember when programmers were basically digital demigods who could craft mission-critical code for lunar missions without breaking a sweat? Yeah, me neither. Today's reality is more like staring blankly at a screen, asking ChatGPT to fix our semicolon errors while we're trapped in Vim because apparently that's still a thing in 2024. And let's not forget the classic "fix one bug, spawn three more" - nature's way of keeping us humble. The golden age of programming never existed. We just replaced "I don't know how to do this" with "I don't know how to ask AI to do this for me."

The great developer migration of 2023 visualized. Massive crowd flocking to ChatGPT while one lonely soul still visits Stack Overflow. Remember when we had to actually read through 15 answers, each starting with "Actually, you shouldn't do it that way" before finding a solution that worked? Now we just ask the AI and get code that's wrong in exciting new ways instead of the familiar old ways. Progress!

Oh honey, the AUDACITY of developers who think they can sneak AI-generated code into the codebase without anyone noticing! 💅 It's like wearing a neon sign that screams "I TOOK SHORTCUTS!" The second your team reviews that suspiciously perfect yet weirdly alien code, they'll sense a disturbance in the Force faster than Darth Vader at a family reunion. Your code review is about to become more dramatic than a telenovela season finale when everyone realizes you let ChatGPT do your homework!

We've all been there. You don't trust a single AI anymore, so you've basically turned coding into a democracy where ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and DeepSeek all get a vote. Ask the same question to five different AI overlords, paste their responses into separate files, run them all, and pick whichever one doesn't explode. It's like speed dating but for code solutions. The "like a psychopath" part hits different because it's true. You're not debugging anymore—you're conducting a Hunger Games for algorithms. May the best AI-generated code win. The real kicker? This is somehow more efficient than reading documentation.

Google Gemini just gave the most "random" string in the history of random strings. Nothing says "I'm definitely not using a pattern" like literally using the alphabet followed by sequential numbers. That's like asking for a random password and getting "password123". Next they'll tell us their favorite dice roll is always 3.5.