We Follow Agile Principles

Oh. My. GOD. The circle of software development life in its purest form! 💀 First, the ACTUAL ENGINEER creates something and proudly announces it. Then some random person with a fancy logo head has the AUDACITY to question if they really made it?! But wait! The plot thickens! The fancy-logo-head STEALS the creation, turns around, and claims it as their own! And then - THE BETRAYAL - the original engineer is now labeled a "VIBECODER" and gets the same treatment they gave others! The final panel is just *chef's kiss* - our newly minted VIBECODER standing there, pathetically claiming credit for something they actually DID make, but nobody believes them anymore. It's the software development karma police coming full circle!

BEHOLD! The majestic art of software development in its purest form! This traffic light is LITERALLY hanging on by a thread but still bravely showing that red light like it's its ONLY purpose in life. 💅 This is EXACTLY what happens when your PM says "ship it anyway" and you're left with code that's one gust of wind away from total catastrophe. The traffic light DOESN'T CARE that it's dangling precariously - it has ONE JOB and by the gods of technical debt, it's doing it! Minimum viable product at its finest, darling! Who needs proper implementation when the core functionality works?! *dramatic hair flip*

Oh man, this is EXACTLY how sprint planning goes down! 🔥 Junior dev shows up all proud with their measly 3 story points while the senior dev is sitting there with a smirk, ready to absolutely demolish the sprint with a TWENTY-ONE POINTER task! 💪 The Scrum Master's probably having a heart attack in the corner. "That's not how story points work!" Meanwhile Product Owner is frantically updating the burndown chart. Pure chaos! Every dev knows that feeling when you're about to drop the "actually this is way more complex than everyone thinks" bomb during estimation. Power move!

Ah, the classic "we just found a bug in something you built during the Obama administration" scenario. That forced smile hides the internal screaming of every developer who's had to dive back into ancient code they don't even remember writing. The best part? The feature probably worked perfectly for 4 years until someone decided to use it in a way that defies all logic and reason. Now you get to archaeologically excavate your own code while the client watches with that "we're paying you a lot of money" expression. Time to dust off the old commit history and figure out what past-you was thinking... if you even documented it. Spoiler alert: you didn't.

The existential crisis every developer faces when AI enters the chat. We spend decades perfecting the art of turning vague client requirements into functional code, only for some robot to ask if we can even do our jobs anymore. That moment of self-reflection hits hard because we all know the truth – half our job is deciphering what "make it pop" actually means while the other half is Googling syntax we've forgotten for the fifth time this week. Meanwhile, ChatGPT is sitting there smugly generating entire codebases from prompts like "website but pretty pls." The audacity.

Who needs proper branching strategies when you can just dump everything into one glorious commit? The top shows a complex git branch workflow with multiple feature branches merging together - you know, what they teach in those fancy "best practices" courses. Meanwhile, the bottom shows what we actually do: one straight line of commits because who has time for that organized nonsense? Nothing says "I'll fix it in production" quite like bypassing code reviews and merging directly to main. Git blame? More like git shame.