Average Rust Enjoyer Be Like

This meme is a hilarious take on the Rust programming language's reputation in the developer community! At the top, we see a beautiful, thriving ecosystem with a C language logo sun shining brightly. Meanwhile, underground there's a dark cave where the Grim Reaper (representing memory safety issues) is filming people worshipping an angry crab with lightning bolts (the Rust mascot/logo). The title "isRustEvil" is playing on the joke that Rust enthusiasts are sometimes viewed as cult-like in their devotion to the language. While C sits above in the established programming world, Rust is portrayed as this underground movement with zealous followers. The meme pokes fun at how some developers view Rust advocates - as if they're part of some strange cult that worships memory safety and ownership principles while demonizing languages like C. The person trying to climb out represents developers trying to escape the "Rust evangelism strike force" that's always telling everyone to rewrite everything in Rust! It's a classic example of programming language tribalism taken to a hilarious extreme. Whether you're a Rust fan or skeptic, you've probably encountered the passionate debates about whether Rust should replace C/C++ in systems programming.

Oh look, another Rust hater crawled out of their legacy codebase! This savage takedown of Rust's infamous borrow checker ("variables weren't made to be borrowed") and compilation times hits where it hurts. The comparison to PHP as the original "rewrite shit for a laugh" language is particularly brutal. The bottom part mocks the stereotypical Rust evangelist trifecta: terminal screenshots showing compile times, the anime-inspired aesthetic of some community members, and that eye-searing hot pink logo. And that .try_into().unwrap() pickup line? Pure cringe gold that perfectly captures the "I'm smarter than you" energy that makes some Rust advocates insufferable. The irony is that while mocking Rust zealots, this meme has become exactly what it hates—another tribal battle cry in the endless programming language wars.

In Rust, you have to explicitly mark code as unsafe when you're about to do something that might summon demons from the ninth circle of memory hell. Meanwhile in C++, the entire language is basically one giant unsafe block where dangling pointers and buffer overflows are just part of the authentic experience. It's like driving a car with no seatbelts, airbags, or brakes—but hey, at least it's fast! The irony is that in C++, the unsafe part is invisible—it's just assumed you enjoy living dangerously. Rust at least has the courtesy to make you type out "I know what I'm doing" before it lets you shoot yourself in the foot.

The first two panels show our protagonist happily accepting normal entry point functions in Rust and C/C++. "Yeah, that makes sense!" she cheerfully exclaims. Then panel three hits with Python's bizarre if __name__ == '__main__': pattern - the cursed incantation every Python dev has blindly copy-pasted a thousand times without questioning why we need this arcane check just to run a damn script. And that final panel? Pure existential horror. Seven years into my career and I still type this abomination with muscle memory while silently wondering who hurt the Python designers.

The bell curve of programming intelligence in its natural habitat. On the left, you've got Python devs thinking duck typing is revolutionary. On the right, assembly wizards who've transcended the mortal concept of types. And in the middle? The poor souls who spent four years learning about strict type systems in CS programs, sweating through every variable declaration like it's a religious ritual. The true galaxy brains are the ones who've gone so far in either direction that they circle back to the same conclusion: "Data types don't matter." Horseshoe theory of programming, folks.

Nobody cares what language your backend is written in. They only care if it's fast. Yet every Rust developer seems physically incapable of describing their code without using the phrase "blazingly fast" at least 47 times per conversation. The cult-like obsession with Rust's performance is matched only by the collective eye-rolling of everyone forced to listen to another sermon about zero-cost abstractions and memory safety.