We Know

Ah, Golang's date formatting—the language where someone thought, "You know what developers need? More cognitive load!" Instead of using sensible formats like everyone else, Go decided that the reference date January 2, 2006 at 3:04:05 PM MST (01/02 03:04:05PM '06 -0700) would be their magic template. Want to format a date? Just remember which parts of this specific moment in time to use! It's like having to recite a magic incantation every time you need to print a simple timestamp. Seven years into using Go and I still have to Google this nonsense every single time.

Content 4 Answers order by votes 49 V I'm the author of that module and unfortunately that isn't possible. It is a planned feature, and (a small) part of the internal infrastructure is there to support it, but it isn't currently available and I can't say when it will be. Update: this feature was never implemented and is no longer planned. Share Improve this answer Follow

Database normalization? Never heard of her! This is the ultimate programmer IQ distribution chart where the galaxy brains on both ends have discovered that storing JSON blobs in PostgreSQL is actually... totally fine? Meanwhile, the sweating middle-ground folks are clutching their database textbooks screaming about proper relational design and creating separate tables for each entity like their professors taught them. Plot twist: Both extremes are right but for wildly different reasons. The low-IQ chad just wants to ship code and doesn't care about third normal form. The high-IQ monk has transcended traditional database design, understands JSONB indexing, and knows that sometimes denormalization is actually the move for performance. The middle? They're having an existential crisis about whether their CS degree was a lie. Spoiler alert: We're ALL guilty of yeeting JSON into Postgres at 2 AM when the deadline is tomorrow. No judgment here! 🙈

Content Dear maintainer: When I wrote this code, only I and God knew what it was. Now, only God knows! So if you are done trying to 'optimize' this routine (and failed), please increment the following counter as a warning to the next guy: totalhourswastedhere 67

The pedantic programmer strikes again! While normal people casually say "age is just a number," the developer in the room can't help but interrupt with their technically correct but socially oblivious correction. In most programming languages, age would indeed be stored as a string when input from a form before conversion—a fact absolutely nobody asked for or needed to know at that moment. It's the coding equivalent of responding "actually, it's spelled 'you're'" to someone pouring their heart out in a text message.

So you're telling me 30% of your new code is AI-generated and you've got a bug where clicking 'X' spawns Task Manager instances like rabbits? The math checks out. Nothing says "cutting-edge AI-powered development" quite like a basic UI interaction causing process duplication. Really makes you wonder what that 30% of AI code is doing—probably writing infinite loops and feeling proud about it. The corporate irony here is chef's kiss: bragging about AI productivity while shipping bugs that would make a junior dev blush. Sure, AI can write code faster, but apparently nobody told it about the whole "quality assurance" thing. At this rate, Windows 12 will just be a chatbot apologizing for bugs in real-time.