Very Inefficient But Entertaining

The duality of developer existence in one perfect image! Cackling maniacally at jokes about null pointers and race conditions, then immediately transitioning to existential dread when facing your own codebase. That brief dopamine hit from understanding obscure programming humor is the only thing sustaining us through the 47 merge conflicts waiting in our pull request. Nothing quite matches the cognitive dissonance of finding regex jokes hilarious while simultaneously forgetting how to write a basic for loop in your actual job.

Content DEBUGGING OR SOMETHING, (DIBUM A GITML DEVELOPER

Content did you know... undies r fb.meyuva.krishna.memes in order to play the role of an insane and mentally depressed person in the movie "Joker", Joaquin Phoenix started learning programming in assembly.

Content Actual programmers on this sub Me in 9th grade comp sci having no idea what you guys are talking about

Content foreach (var item in items) if (condition) Foo (); Bar(); ? foreach (var item in items) if (!condition) continue; ? Foo () ; Bar ();

When philosophers ask if a clone is the same person, programmers swoop in with the actual technical answer. Clone by reference? Same memory address, same person. Clone by value? New memory allocation, different person. Leave it to devs to solve ancient philosophical debates with a one-liner about pointers. This is why we're not invited to dinner parties.