Finally, after years of search I found a real tree

Content 000 IF YOU PROGRAM A "NO" BUTTON TO SAY "MAYBE LATER" YOU HAVE FAILED AT BOTH INTERFACE DESIGN AND BASIC CONSENT 6:13 PM - Jan 19, 2021 TweetDeck 226 Retweets 10 Quote Tweets 810 Likes

Content STOP DOING FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING LOOPS WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE GIVEN NAMES YEARS OF HOFs yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for going higher than CALLBACKS Wanted to go higher anyway for a laugh? We had a tool for that: It was called AbstractWidgetLocalizerManagerFactoryBe "Yes please FOLD over this collection . Please give me a CURRIED function" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged Functional LOOK at what Programmers have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the boilerplate compilers we built for them Functional (These are REAL Functions, done by REAL Programmers ): set it Lens' 8 a - a - g -) set In v g runidentity (la (const (Identity v)) 8) Class Profunctor () :: Maybe a - (a - Maybe b) - Maybe b dinap a over :: Lens' s a - (a - a) - 8 - s over In g g runidentity (In (Identity viev :: Lens's a - g - a Inap f dinap f id 01530 10 () :: Maybe a - Maybe b - Maybe b return :: a - Maybe a viev Is v s getConst (la Const s) ????? ??????? ????????????????? "Hello I would like a Monad m please" They have played us for absolute fools

Content WEBSITES WHEN YOU SCRAPE THEIR CONTENT WEBSITES WHEN THEY INSTAI COOKIES ON YOUR COMPUTER, TRACK YOUR BROWSING HISTORY, AND MINE BITCOIN ON YOUR BROWSER

Content Evolution of religions Israelite tradition Mesopotamic mythology Vedic tradition Shramana tradition Judaism Buddhism Catholicism Islam Eastern Orthodox Zen Protestantism American Buddhism Evolution of programming languages ALGOL Assembler Lambda calculus S Expressions Java Objective Scheme Go Python Aliens Scientology Aliens Hoon

The eternal standoff between developers and compilers! Your precious code is like a rickety fort that you're convinced is architectural brilliance. Meanwhile, the compiler crawls in, sniffs around, and goes "something's definitely off in here." But who needs warnings anyway? Just slap on those -Wno-everything flags or @SuppressWarnings annotations and suddenly your code is flawless again! The compiler may detect 47 potential null pointer dereferences, but clearly it just doesn't understand your genius implementation of Schrodinger's variable that's simultaneously null and not-null until observed in production.

The eternal confusion of "MVP" - to an athlete, it's "Most Valuable Player." To the exhausted dev who just shipped a barely functional prototype at 3am, it's "Minimum Viable Product." The hollow smile of that software engineer says it all... "Thanks for recognizing my rushed code held together by Stack Overflow answers and prayers." Same acronym, vastly different levels of glory.