Entire tech industry right now

Content C A programming language for Real Men. Most languages try to provide a simplified way to solve specific problems well. C makes no such concession and tries to be mediocre at everything. It lets you program at a very high level, and a very low level in the same program. It lets you write procedural code, object oriented code, generic code and mix them all up. It makes you decide everything and provides no help if you get it wrong. It is by far the biggest, most complicated, ugly, down-right dangerous language you can use. But it does run fast. It takes at least twice as long to program in C as any other major language (except C). The men who program in C are Real Men. The women who program in C are Real Men too. You can spot a C programmer from their testosterone fueled swagger, and the unbelievable amount of contempt they inject into the phrase Java "programmer". They'll probably do the air quotes and all. Dev: 'Hey, Reg, you know C right? What does: "Isrc Cont. cpp(52) : error C2679: binary '': no operator found which takes a right- hand operand of type 'int' (or there is no acceptable conversion) C: Program Files Microsoft Visual Studio 8C include vector (392): could be 'std: VectoriteratorT, Alloc std:VectoriteratorTy, Alloc:operator (const std:VectoriteratorTy, Alloc' with TyMain::Cont, Allocstd allocator Main::Cont while trying to match the argument list (std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc, int)'with TyMain::Cont, Allocstd::allocatorMain::Cont " mean?' Reg: 'You missed a semicolon at the end of the line.' ProdrammerHumor.io

Content ARRAYS START AT 1. YOV'RE MY SON AND NO MATTER WHAT, YOUR MOTHER AND I WILL ALWAYS LOVE YOU. FREE DISAPPOINTEN

Content snakecase Pros: Concise when it consists of a few words. Cons: Redundant as hell when it gets longer. pushsomethingtofirstqueue, popwhat, getwhatever. PascalCase Pros: Seems neat. GetItem, SetItem, Convert, Cons: Barely used. (why?) camelCase Pros: Widely used in the programmer community Cons: Looks ugly when a few methods are -worded. push, reserve, beginBuilding, skewer-case Pros: Easy to type. easier-than-capitals, easier-than-underscore, Cons: Any sane language freaks out when you try it. SCREAMINGSNAKECASE Pros: Can demonstrate your anger with text. Cons: Makes your eyes deaf. LOOKATTHIS, LOOKATTHAT, 100KHEREYOUMORON, nocase Pros: Looks professional. Cons: Misleading af. supersexyhippothalamus, bool penisbig, fUcKtHeCaSe Pros: Can live outside of the law. Cons: Can be out of a job. merHumor. to

Someone discovered the ultimate GitHub contribution hack: commit trivial README changes every single day to maintain that beautiful green graph. Look at that contribution grid—10,725 contributions in a year! Impressive, right? Until you scroll down and see seven consecutive "Update README.md" commits, all authored 19 hours ago, all verified. The irony here is chef's kiss. Sure, consistency is important in software development, but when your "consistency" is just fixing whitespace or adding a period to your README every day to keep your contribution streak alive, you're basically the coding equivalent of someone who goes to the gym just to take a selfie. Pro tip: GitHub counts contributions, not value. You could be shipping production-breaking code or fixing a typo in your README—both get the same green square. The contribution graph doesn't lie about frequency, but it sure doesn't tell the whole truth about impact.

Content Day 1 at the gym just finished taking a shit let's start the work out ProdrammerHumor.io L Day 3 at work just finished , d setting up the local environment let's start coding

OH. MY. GOD. The absolute TRAGEDY of spending 30 HOURS automating a task that takes 3 MINUTES to do manually! But darling, that's the hill we die on! 💅 The banner says it ALL: "We do this not because it is easy, but because we thought it would be easy." The AUDACITY of our optimism! The DELUSION of our time estimates! Sure, I could just do the task 600 times manually before breaking even on my automation investment, but where's the DRAMA in that? The THRILL of overengineering? The pure ECSTASY of writing a script that will save me time in some hypothetical future that will never come?!