Emotional Damage: When Your Code Gets Put Down

Content I r UNICODE

Content AbsoluteFill styleI display: 'flex', justifyContent: 'center' alignItems: 'center' fontSize: '4rem' beautiful font fontFamily: 'Comic Sans MS', children AbsoluteFill

The difference between how versioning should work and how it actually works in some codebases. According to semantic versioning, you increment the major version (like 1.0 to 2.0) when you make changes that break backward compatibility. But then there's that one developer who breaks something with literally every commit and somehow still has a job. Their changelog probably just reads "Fixed stuff, broke other stuff" for every release. It's basically the software development equivalent of playing Russian roulette with a fully loaded gun.

Content No text found in image

Content This sub to Ct This stis to Jave mgflip.com Oh dear, oh dear. Gorgeous. You fucking donkey.

Ah yes, the classic "stating the obvious" comment. The car door literally says "This DOOR is Blue" while being clearly silver/white. It's the programming equivalent of writing int x = 5; // this is 5 instead of explaining why x needs to be 5. After 15 years in the industry, I've learned that future you will hate past you for these comments. The real documentation we need is "WHY this door is painted differently" not "WHAT color it obviously isn't." Just like your code should explain the how, your comments should explain the why.