At least its not as bad as Java Classes.

Content SUPERCODER 2000

The bell curve of developer intelligence has spoken: only the truly enlightened (bottom 0.1% and top 0.1%) understand that standalone binaries are superior, while the mediocre 68% in the middle are screaming about containerized environments like they've discovered fire. It's the perfect illustration of how software development fashion works - the beginners and masters quietly compile to binaries while everyone with average intelligence overcomplicates deployment with Docker manifests, Kubernetes configs, and seventeen layers of abstraction just to run "Hello World." The cosmic joke? Those containers are ultimately running binaries anyway. Full circle, but with extra steps.

Oh my gosh, this is the cutest burn in software engineering history! 😆 The meme shows adorable cats looking at Brooks' Law which basically says adding more devs to a project actually makes it take longer ! It's like when your manager says "let's add 5 more people to meet the deadline" and suddenly everyone's just having meetings about meetings! The irony is wrapped in fluffy cat cuteness which makes the painful truth easier to swallow. Every dev who's been on a bloated project is nodding furiously right now while simultaneously aww-ing at those cats!

Content It is semicolon we will hardly use it. Computer Science Student :

Content Have you ever seen code so bad it made you laugh? David Seidman, former Security Program Manager at Microsoft (2005-2016) Answered Feb 8 Upvoted by Aveesha Sharma, Masters of Science Software Engineering, Arizona State Univ... and Mandeep Kaur, MS Software Engineering, San Jose State University (2017) R. I was working for Microsoft's security incident response team investigating a vulnerability. We opened up the relevant file. It contained 10,000 lines of uncommented archaic C code. At the top was a single comment: This code has bugs. It did. ProdrammerHumor.io

Oh the existential crisis of realizing kids think floppy disks are just weird 3D-printed save icons! That 3.5" diskette in the image—with its mighty 1.44MB capacity—was once cutting-edge tech that could store approximately 1/3000th of your average smartphone photo. Back then, we'd physically insert our data into computers like barbarians instead of summoning it from the mystical cloud. The real kicker? That little plastic square outlived its usefulness decades ago but somehow achieved digital immortality as an icon. It's like using a hieroglyph emoji—nobody's seen the real thing in ages, but we all know what it means!