Active Problems

Content Age: 150-200 Gender, Unknown Mood Fear Age: 15-20 Gender: Male Mood: Horn

The MIT license literally says "do whatever you want with this code, I don't care." It's the most permissive open-source license out there—you can use it, modify it, sell it, tattoo it on your forehead, whatever. So when a dev slaps MIT on their repo and then has a meltdown on Twitter because someone actually *used* their code, it's like putting up a "FREE PIZZA" sign and then crying when people eat the pizza. The cat's bewildered stance perfectly captures the rest of us watching this drama unfold, wondering if they've ever actually read the license they chose. Pro tip: if you don't want people using your code, maybe don't pick the license that's basically the digital equivalent of "take it, it's yours."

Content Me after doing a simple SQL query (180654 rows affected) ('m absolutely cooked) Proar

Content CHOP CHOP AARGH WHY IS THIS STRUCTURE HERE? WHERE COULD THIS BRIDGE POSSIBLY LEAD ? WHAT A HORRIBLY DESIGNED STREET, MOST INEFFICIENT. WHAT IS ALL THIS CRAP? THIS SIGN DOESN'T HELP ME MUCH. THiS IS BRIDGE GOOD GOD! WHAT THE HELL DOES THIS CONTRAPTION DO? I hate reading other people's code.

Spotted in the wild: a developer coding without their framework security blanket. The horror! Remember when we built websites with just HTML, CSS, and maybe some vanilla JavaScript? Now we need 237 npm packages just to center a div. The modern frontend ecosystem has convinced us that writing raw HTML is practically a war crime. Meanwhile, that "psychopath" probably shipped a working website while the rest of us were still configuring webpack.