Every Base Is Base 10

The Nobel Committee turning its back on actual computer science to ogle traditional physics is the academic equivalent of your crush ignoring your perfectly engineered app to date someone who can explain why apples fall from trees. Quantum computing? Machine learning breakthroughs? Nah, let's give another medal to someone who found a slightly different way to measure gravity. Meanwhile, the folks revolutionizing how we process information are left swiping through job postings that require "5+ years experience in a framework released last Tuesday."

That moment when you dive into Haskell and suddenly realize your entire programming existence has been a lie. "Where is the loop?" is the functional programming equivalent of a fish asking "where is the bicycle?" Pure functional languages don't do loops—they do recursion and higher-order functions like it's no big deal. Meanwhile, you're standing there like John Travolta, coat in hand, wondering if you accidentally downloaded a programming language or an abstract math thesis. Welcome to Haskell, where imperative programmers come to question their reality.

Sure, normal people count to 10 on their fingers. But us nerds? We're out here counting in binary where each finger is a bit. Two hands = 10 bits = 2^10 = 1024 values. It's the same reason we think 512MB is a nice round number while marketing folks insist on calling it "half a gig." We didn't spend years optimizing algorithms just to use decimal like some kind of animal. The irony? Most of us still use our fingers to count how many bugs we've introduced while fixing the original one.

Oh sweet summer child, you thought drawing a Fibonacci spiral would be a quick little task? THE AUDACITY! One minute you're like "I'll just whip up this simple mathematical pattern" and the next thing you know, you're in the seventh circle of algorithm hell, questioning your life choices while drowning in research papers about the golden ratio and recursive number sequences. It's the classic developer trap - what seems like a 5-minute job morphs into an existential crisis where you're suddenly contemplating if the universe itself follows the Fibonacci sequence. The look of pure defeat in that second panel is basically my soul leaving my body every time I underestimate a "simple" coding task.

THE AUDACITY of young me declaring "I don't need math, I'll just make video games!" only to later discover that game development is LITERALLY a mathematical hellscape! 😭 Fast forward to the soul-crushing reality where Unity, OpenGL, C++, and every other game dev tool are CACKLING at your mathematical ignorance. They're all just sitting there like "Oh honey, you thought you could escape VECTORS and MATRICES? That's adorable!" Game physics? MATH. Graphics rendering? MATH. Character movement? MATH. It's math all the way down, you poor, delusional child!

Left side: Regular 3D rotation math with sines and cosines. Complex but manageable if you've ever implemented a camera system. Right side: Quaternions. Four-dimensional math that makes rotation calculations significantly more efficient but looks like someone dropped acid while reading a linear algebra textbook. Game developers be like: "Yes, I understand quaternions perfectly" while secretly copy-pasting code from Stack Overflow and praying it doesn't introduce gimbal lock.