Where F 1 Meets Linux

Content Junior Dev Senior

Content stackoverflow Products O search... Java Multiple Inner Classes Asked today Modified today Viewed 31 times Home PUBLIC 4 Questions Tags Users Companies COLLECTIVES Explore Collectives TEAMS Stack Overflow for Teams - Start collaborating and sharing organizational knowledge. 2 Free -2 class Af class B String s "X"; class B extends A String s "Y"; class A extends B X public class Main public static void main(String1 args) B b new B(); orints Y System.out.printin(b.s); prints X System.out.println(b.new A().s); Crosto S froc Tosm Why Teams? I really can not understand why the B obiect acts different in this situations. What exaclv happening in the "System.out.printin(b.new AO.s);" part? Can you please explain, thank vou all. java oop inner-classes Share Edit Follow Flag asked 57 mins ago byyavuzyigit I New contributor Sorry, but code like this should be taken out back and shot - Hovercraft Full of Eels 56 mins ago

Someone finally said it. DNS is apparently a scam perpetuated by Big Nameserver to sell more resolvers. Servers were perfectly happy being identified by raw IP addresses until sysadmins got greedy and demanded "respect" in the form of complex distributed systems that nobody understands. The argument here is that we had hosts.txt—a single file that every computer could use to map names to IPs. Simple. Elegant. Completely unscalable. But who needs the internet to grow anyway? Instead, sysadmins convinced everyone we needed this elaborate DNS infrastructure with recursive queries, authoritative nameservers, TTLs, and zone files. Now when someone asks for example.com, you get a 17-step journey through multiple servers just to return an IP address. They've been laughing at us this whole time while we troubleshoot NXDOMAIN errors at 3 AM. The three diagrams with increasing question marks perfectly sum up every developer's understanding of DNS: "I think I get it... wait, what?... I have no idea what's happening anymore."

Content IVA ProarammerHumor.io

The four horsemen of privacy apocalypse, ranked by self-awareness: Microsoft: Caught red-handed, frantically trying damage control. Google: "We're the good guys because we only harvest your browsing data, not everything ." Apple: "Yes we spy, but we told you in paragraph 347 of the EULA you definitely read." Linux: The vegan CrossFitter of operating systems. Doesn't spy and can't shut up about it.

The ultimate privacy solution: replace every Google service with Vim. Because nothing says "I value my digital freedom" like editing your emails with keyboard shortcuts that require a PhD to memorize. Want to check your calendar? Just type :calendar and pray you remember how to exit. Need directions? Good luck rendering Google Maps in ASCII. The irony of replacing ChatGPT with Vim is just *chef's kiss* - trading one text interface that understands you for one that makes you want to throw your computer out the window.