Okay Fine Vim Is Not That Bad

Content Coding In Style Commits When the code is committed to a source control system, a comment needs to be provided. Some systems make it mandatory. This comment has multiple purposes: make it clear what the change was about allow in the future to look at the history in case the issue is found again -allows to inspect the code at each line level to see who changed the code by using Blame option -allows to inspect the code to see why it was added In case you never used it, Blame option is accessed by long clicking "Show the Version Editor" V Comparison Blame doming coX It allows you to find who wrote each line of code, in other words find somebody to blame for bad code. Lots of times, that person is actually you. Syntax Single line comments start with . It is supposed to be used for short comments Multiple line comments starting with and ending with Swift allows the comments to be embedded, so the following is a valid code: 38

Content The Sr. Dev. at Google who did a git revert to last commit I see no God up here Other than ME

Content Product features User needs yes but

The expectation vs reality of reviving ancient hardware with Linux is just brutal. Top panel: "Linux will breathe new life into your Jurassic-era netbook!" Bottom panel: "Oh, you wanted to actually use software? How adorable." Every modern development tool, IDE, and even basic apps giving you the middle finger with compatibility issues. That 32-bit processor might as well be a museum piece trying to run today's 64-bit world. It's like bringing a spoon to a gunfight and wondering why you can't shoot anything.

Content Client expectations Client budget

Content When your pull request that fixed a small typo is accepted an you see your name among the GitHub contributors