the cycle of life, npm, and death

Content I'm a senior software engineer with 6 years of experience in React node.js. I have built products that are used by millions and have generated billions in revenue. I've worked at successful startups. But you won't hire me because I can't solve an algorithm challenge. lol. 01:43 120921 Twitter Web App

Content 800 000800 true 123 000123 false

Content The Google Frontend developer who waited all his life for his error 500 page to finally be seen Something went wrong... Youlube zw Search

This meme is hitting JavaScript developers right where it hurts! The title "Array.reverse Have Sealed Your Fate Brendan Eich" is a direct callout to the creator of JavaScript himself. The cardinal sin being mocked here is writing methods that mutate the original array AND return the same instance - like our beloved villain Array.reverse() . It's the programming equivalent of changing someone's furniture around while they're in the bathroom and then gaslighting them about it. Pure functions? Never heard of her. These mutating methods are why senior devs wake up in cold sweats at 3 AM screaming "IMMUTABILITY!" before checking their git history. Even God himself (or at least a cartoon deity with an impressive beard) has reserved a special place in programmer hell for the perpetrators. Not just regular hell - the boiler room. Where they'll probably be forced to debug Internet Explorer compatibility issues for eternity.

Content else if (reg.body.r "listInstalledPacks") if (req.session.isAdmin true) try htmlcode 11 for (e of listInstalledPackages ( )) if (e ! undefined) htmlCode "div class-package" e.split (".") 0. replace (' res.send ( "status": "s", "content": htmlCode ) catch (err) console.warn ("Error: " err) res.send ( "status": "f" ) 7 else res.status (418). send ("I'm a teapot, and you're not an admin")

Content NYPD TYPESCRIPT CHOOSING ESLINT AS DEVDEPENDENCY ESLINT CHOOSING TYPESCRIPT AS DEVDEPENDENGY